Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from the Azores
Immigrants from China
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from the Azores
Immigrants from China
1,552
SOCIAL INDEX
13.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
302nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from China Integration in Immigrants from the Azores Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,909,112 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from the Azores communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.384. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from the Azores within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.228% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from the Azores corresponds to a decrease of 227.6 Immigrants from China.
Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from China Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,608 compared to $54,264, a difference of 37.0%), householder income over 65 years ($52,121 compared to $69,174, a difference of 32.7%), and median family income ($95,402 compared to $125,540, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.8%), householder income under 25 years ($52,621 compared to $57,931, a difference of 10.1%), and median female earnings ($38,573 compared to $46,972, a difference of 21.8%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from the Azores | Immigrants from China |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,608 | Exceptional $54,264 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $95,402 | Exceptional $125,540 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $80,357 | Exceptional $105,335 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,812 | Exceptional $56,638 |
Median Male Earnings | Fair $53,503 | Exceptional $67,353 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,573 | Exceptional $46,972 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,621 | Exceptional $57,931 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $92,322 | Exceptional $119,756 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $94,138 | Exceptional $122,178 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $52,121 | Exceptional $69,174 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Poor 26.7% |
Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from China Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 71.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 40.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (18.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 6.8%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 12.6%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from the Azores | Immigrants from China |
Poverty | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 10.3% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.0% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.9% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.5% | Exceptional 13.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.9% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Fair 16.8% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.5% | Exceptional 18.1% |
Single Fathers | Excellent 15.9% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 32.2% | Exceptional 26.1% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.4% | Excellent 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 11.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 48.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 37.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and female unemployment (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from the Azores | Immigrants from China |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.1% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 6.4% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.2% | Average 11.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.8% | Good 17.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.1% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.7% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.2% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.7% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 34.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.8% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 2.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from the Azores | Immigrants from China |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.6% | Excellent 65.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.8% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.7% | Tragic 31.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.2% | Tragic 71.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.1% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.5% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.6% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.1% | Exceptional 83.2% |
Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.6% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 60.3%), single father households (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 53.0%), and single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.59%), family households (65.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from the Azores | Immigrants from China |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.6% | Excellent 64.7% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.2% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.21 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.1% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 39.6% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 56.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 25.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 6.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 17.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from the Azores | Immigrants from China |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.7% | Tragic 15.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.4% | Tragic 84.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.4% | Tragic 51.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Tragic 18.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.5% | Poor 6.0% |
Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from China Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 138.0%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 128.1%), and master's degree (10.2% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 107.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.50%), 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.50%), and nursery school (97.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.51%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from the Azores | Immigrants from China |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 2.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 97.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 97.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Tragic 97.4% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Tragic 97.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Tragic 97.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.1% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Tragic 94.7% | Tragic 96.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 93.0% | Tragic 95.3% |
8th Grade | Tragic 92.5% | Tragic 95.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 90.8% | Tragic 94.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 89.0% | Tragic 93.2% |
11th Grade | Tragic 87.2% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 85.3% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 82.8% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 78.7% | Exceptional 86.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 54.7% | Exceptional 70.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 48.4% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 35.6% | Exceptional 55.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 27.3% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.2% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 3.1% |
Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from China Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 132.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 64.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 5.8%), disability age over 75 (50.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 9.9%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 28.2%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from the Azores | Immigrants from China |
Disability | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Tragic 14.9% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.2% | Exceptional 0.96% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.5% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 26.0% | Exceptional 20.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.9% | Exceptional 46.3% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 2.3% |