Icelander vs Chilean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Icelander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Icelanders

Chileans

Good
Excellent
8,070
SOCIAL INDEX
78.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
89th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chilean Integration in Icelander Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,214,853 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Icelander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.409. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Icelanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.048% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Icelanders corresponds to an increase of 47.6 Chileans.
Icelander Integration in Chilean Communities

Icelander vs Chilean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Icelander and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($85,797 compared to $90,605, a difference of 5.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,560 compared to $99,900, a difference of 4.5%), and wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,415 compared to $56,973, a difference of 2.8%), per capita income ($44,987 compared to $46,459, a difference of 3.3%), and median earnings ($46,916 compared to $48,504, a difference of 3.4%).
Icelander vs Chilean Income
Income MetricIcelanderChilean
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$44,987
Exceptional
$46,459
Median Family Income
Good
$104,282
Exceptional
$108,429
Median Household Income
Good
$85,797
Exceptional
$90,605
Median Earnings
Good
$46,916
Exceptional
$48,504
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,415
Exceptional
$56,973
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,109
Exceptional
$40,757
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,247
Exceptional
$53,185
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,560
Exceptional
$99,900
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,261
Exceptional
$106,611
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,270
Exceptional
$63,957
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.5%
Fair
26.3%

Icelander vs Chilean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Icelander and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 12.5%), married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (13.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.65%), poverty (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and family poverty (8.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 1.3%).
Icelander vs Chilean Poverty
Poverty MetricIcelanderChilean
Poverty
Good
11.9%
Excellent
11.8%
Families
Exceptional
8.3%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Good
11.0%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Excellent
13.0%
Excellent
12.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.3%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.3%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Exceptional
19.9%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.5%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.5%
Excellent
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Poor
12.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.5%
Excellent
11.0%

Icelander vs Chilean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Icelander and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 19.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.54%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.69%).
Icelander vs Chilean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIcelanderChilean
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
5.4%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Average
5.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.9%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Excellent
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.3%

Icelander vs Chilean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Icelander and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.85%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.47%).
Icelander vs Chilean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIcelanderChilean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.8%
Poor
35.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.9%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Average
82.8%
Exceptional
83.4%

Icelander vs Chilean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Icelander and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 4.5%), family households (63.3% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.21%), currently married (47.3% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.64%), and married-couple households (47.0% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.0%).
Icelander vs Chilean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIcelanderChilean
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
65.2%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Good
47.0%
Exceptional
47.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.3%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.3%
Good
30.7%

Icelander vs Chilean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 15.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 9.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.42%), no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 3.4%).
Icelander vs Chilean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIcelanderChilean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.6%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.5%
Good
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.0%
Excellent
56.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Good
19.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Good
6.4%

Icelander vs Chilean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Icelander and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.0%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.9%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (62.1% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 0.15%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.35%).
Icelander vs Chilean Education Level
Education Level MetricIcelanderChilean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Average
97.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Average
95.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Good
93.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Excellent
91.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.5%
Good
89.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.1%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.3%
Exceptional
67.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Exceptional
62.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.3%
Exceptional
49.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.5%
Exceptional
41.2%
Master's Degree
Good
15.5%
Exceptional
16.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.2%

Icelander vs Chilean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 13.1%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.57%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.3%).
Icelander vs Chilean Disability
Disability MetricIcelanderChilean
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Exceptional
11.1%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Exceptional
10.7%
Females
Excellent
12.0%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Poor
5.7%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.3%
Exceptional
22.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.7%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%