Houma vs German Russian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Houma
German Russian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Houma
German Russians
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,821
SOCIAL INDEX
45.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
192nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
German Russian Integration in Houma Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,816,834 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of German Russians within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.046% in German Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to an increase of 46.0 German Russians.
Houma vs German Russian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (38.7% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 56.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $89,398, a difference of 24.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($44,822 compared to $55,356, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $49,924, a difference of 1.3%), householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $45,673, a difference of 3.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,044 compared to $85,220, a difference of 10.6%).
Income Metric | Houma | German Russian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $32,996 | Tragic $40,266 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $76,188 | Tragic $93,858 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $62,575 | Tragic $75,856 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,949 | Tragic $43,200 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,547 | Tragic $49,924 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $30,343 | Tragic $37,105 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,356 | Tragic $45,673 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,044 | Tragic $85,220 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $72,093 | Tragic $89,398 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $44,822 | Tragic $55,356 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 38.7% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Houma vs German Russian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (23.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 72.2%), family poverty (14.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 55.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (22.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 52.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.2% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 4.0%), child poverty among girls under 16 (21.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 20.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (22.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 21.0%).
Poverty Metric | Houma | German Russian |
Poverty | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 13.4% |
Families | Tragic 14.6% | Poor 9.4% |
Males | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 12.2% |
Females | Tragic 20.0% | Tragic 14.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 26.2% | Tragic 25.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 14.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 18.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 24.9% | Tragic 17.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 26.2% | Poor 17.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Tragic 17.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 23.5% | Tragic 13.6% |
Single Females | Tragic 33.8% | Tragic 23.9% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 26.7% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 43.5% | Tragic 31.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.4% | Excellent 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.7% | Average 11.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.2% | Average 12.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 16.5% | Average 11.8% |
Houma vs German Russian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 68.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 46.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 8.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Houma | German Russian |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 21.6% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 7.8% | Average 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.4% | Tragic 8.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 8.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.8% | Good 5.4% |
Houma vs German Russian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 19.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 11.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (59.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 6.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Houma | German Russian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 59.5% | Exceptional 66.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 72.7% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.6% | Exceptional 42.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.7% | Exceptional 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.2% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.9% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 79.5% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 74.1% | Good 82.8% |
Houma vs German Russian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 40.7%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.6%), and single mother households (7.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.5% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.080%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.0%), and married-couple households (44.6% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 1.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Houma | German Russian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.7% | Tragic 60.9% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Tragic 26.8% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.6% | Tragic 44.0% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Tragic 3.15 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.9% | Poor 6.7% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.5% | Tragic 45.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.6% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 46.6% | Poor 33.1% |
Houma vs German Russian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 42.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 27.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 8.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Houma | German Russian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.5% | Average 10.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.6% | Average 89.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.4% | Good 55.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 20.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Houma vs German Russian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 84.9%), professional degree (2.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 79.0%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 70.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.94%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.98%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.98%).
Education Level Metric | Houma | German Russian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.3% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.2% | Exceptional 94.4% |
11th Grade | Tragic 87.0% | Exceptional 93.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 83.7% | Excellent 91.8% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.5% | Exceptional 90.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 75.0% | Good 86.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 47.6% | Average 65.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 41.2% | Fair 59.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 28.2% | Poor 45.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 21.4% | Poor 35.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 13.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.2% | Tragic 4.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 0.96% | Fair 1.8% |
Houma vs German Russian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 54.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 50.0%), and vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.7%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 14.7%), and disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 18.8%).
Disability Metric | Houma | German Russian |
Disability | Tragic 17.1% | Tragic 12.3% |
Males | Tragic 17.4% | Tragic 12.0% |
Females | Tragic 16.9% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 9.1% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.7% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 18.7% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.3% | Tragic 24.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 56.2% | Average 47.3% |
Vision | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 3.3% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.3% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 6.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Good 2.5% |