Hopi vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Hopi
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Hopi
Chickasaw
1,478
SOCIAL INDEX
12.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
306th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Hopi Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,244,294 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Hopi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.991. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hopi within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.184% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hopi corresponds to an increase of 183.9 Chickasaw.
![Hopi Integration in Chickasaw Communities](/correlation-charts/comparison/hopi-vs-chickasaw/hopi-vs-chickasaw-community-integration.webp)
Hopi vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Hopi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 35.7%), per capita income ($31,177 compared to $36,475, a difference of 17.0%), and median male earnings ($42,060 compared to $47,832, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($33,932 compared to $34,414, a difference of 1.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($75,002 compared to $77,929, a difference of 3.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($46,978 compared to $44,763, a difference of 5.0%).
![Hopi vs Chickasaw Income](/correlation-charts/comparison/hopi-vs-chickasaw/hopi-vs-chickasaw-income.webp)
Income Metric | Hopi | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $31,177 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,188 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $65,043 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,871 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,060 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,932 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $46,978 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $75,002 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $75,562 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,925 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 20.0% | Tragic 27.2% |
Hopi vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hopi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (27.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 68.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 66.4%), and receiving food stamps (21.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 64.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.5% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 0.080%), single female poverty (28.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 6.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.2% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 15.2%).
![Hopi vs Chickasaw Poverty](/correlation-charts/comparison/hopi-vs-chickasaw/hopi-vs-chickasaw-poverty.webp)
Poverty Metric | Hopi | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.2% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 23.7% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.7% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 25.9% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 27.9% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 27.5% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 28.0% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.5% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 17.8% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 18.9% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 13.1% |
Hopi vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hopi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 108.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (19.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 100.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (13.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 100.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 17.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 19.7%).
![Hopi vs Chickasaw Unemployment](/correlation-charts/comparison/hopi-vs-chickasaw/hopi-vs-chickasaw-unemployment.webp)
Unemployment Metric | Hopi | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 10.8% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 8.1% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 21.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 30.7% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 13.5% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 8.9% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 8.1% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.4% | Good 5.4% |
Hopi vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hopi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 20.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (66.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 12.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (76.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (77.0% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.4%).
![Hopi vs Chickasaw Labor Participation](/correlation-charts/comparison/hopi-vs-chickasaw/hopi-vs-chickasaw-labor-force.webp)
Labor Participation Metric | Hopi | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 58.4% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 71.7% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.8% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 66.0% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 76.5% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.3% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 77.0% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 75.0% | Tragic 79.0% |
Hopi vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hopi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (50.8% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 40.0%), currently married (36.5% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 27.5%), and married-couple households (36.7% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.3%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 8.0%).
![Hopi vs Chickasaw Family Structure](/correlation-charts/comparison/hopi-vs-chickasaw/hopi-vs-chickasaw-family-structure.webp)
Family Structure Metric | Hopi | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.3% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.2% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 36.7% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.60 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.5% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 36.5% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 50.8% | Tragic 36.3% |
Hopi vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hopi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 74.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 22.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (49.0% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 6.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (49.0% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 20.3%).
![Hopi vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability](/correlation-charts/comparison/hopi-vs-chickasaw/hopi-vs-chickasaw-vehicle-availability.webp)
Vehicle Availability Metric | Hopi | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.4% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 49.0% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.9% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Hopi vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hopi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 31.3%), bachelor's degree (25.3% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 20.2%), and associate's degree (34.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.070%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.070%).
![Hopi vs Chickasaw Education Level](/correlation-charts/comparison/hopi-vs-chickasaw/hopi-vs-chickasaw-education-level.webp)
Education Level Metric | Hopi | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Good 97.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Good 97.2% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Excellent 96.3% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Good 95.9% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.8% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.5% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.6% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 86.6% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.0% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 57.1% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 50.9% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 34.6% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 25.3% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.9% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.5% |
Hopi vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hopi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (4.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 166.0%), male disability (12.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 20.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (30.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 0.84%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.3%).
![Hopi vs Chickasaw Disability](/correlation-charts/comparison/hopi-vs-chickasaw/hopi-vs-chickasaw-disability.webp)
Disability Metric | Hopi | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 4.6% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.9% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.0% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 52.9% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.9% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.6% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.9% |