Hmong vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 7,803,001 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.163. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 4.106% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to an increase of 4,106.1 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $62,330, a difference of 10.6%), wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 7.5%), and median female earnings ($35,498 compared to $37,905, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($75,839 compared to $76,383, a difference of 0.72%), per capita income ($38,120 compared to $39,163, a difference of 2.7%), and median earnings ($42,111 compared to $43,393, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 37.3%), receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 34.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and single female poverty (23.1% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 126.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 108.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 90.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 8.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 16.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.89%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 42.5%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 36.0%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.27, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and family households (64.9% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 50.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 15.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 4.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 32.9%), bachelor's degree (34.8% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 20.6%), and associate's degree (43.4% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.48%), 4th grade (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.74%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 55.2%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 37.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 5.2%).