Finnish vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Finnish
Ecuadorian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Finns
Ecuadorians
6,815
SOCIAL INDEX
65.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
141st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ecuadorian Integration in Finnish Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 259,690,696 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Finnish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.395. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Finns within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Finns corresponds to a decrease of 14.8 Ecuadorians.
Finnish vs Ecuadorian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Finnish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 24.8%), householder income over 65 years ($59,535 compared to $54,958, a difference of 8.3%), and median family income ($102,676 compared to $95,114, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,940 compared to $45,214, a difference of 1.6%), median household income ($83,607 compared to $82,070, a difference of 1.9%), and median female earnings ($38,173 compared to $39,117, a difference of 2.5%).
Income Metric | Finnish | Ecuadorian |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,461 | Poor $41,958 |
Median Family Income | Average $102,676 | Tragic $95,114 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,607 | Poor $82,070 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,940 | Poor $45,214 |
Median Male Earnings | Average $54,721 | Tragic $51,596 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,173 | Fair $39,117 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,827 | Exceptional $53,911 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Average $94,610 | Poor $91,574 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Average $99,904 | Tragic $93,739 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $59,535 | Tragic $54,958 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.6% | Exceptional 22.9% |
Finnish vs Ecuadorian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Finnish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 56.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 49.3%), and receiving food stamps (10.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.48%), single father poverty (16.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and single mother poverty (30.0% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 2.8%).
Poverty Metric | Finnish | Ecuadorian |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.4% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.8% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.7% | Tragic 14.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.3% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 19.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 19.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.6% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Poor 21.5% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 16.9% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.0% | Tragic 30.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 14.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 15.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 14.9% |
Finnish vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Finnish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 35.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 32.3%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Finnish | Ecuadorian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 6.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.9% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Fair 5.5% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.0% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.5% |
Finnish vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Finnish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.9% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 39.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.7% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.56%).
Labor Participation Metric | Finnish | Ecuadorian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.2% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.5% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.9% | Tragic 31.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 78.7% | Tragic 72.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 85.0% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Excellent 83.1% | Tragic 82.3% |
Finnish vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Finnish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 26.8%), currently married (48.8% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 11.8%), and married-couple households (48.1% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.66%), family households (63.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 4.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Finnish | Ecuadorian |
Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.6% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.1% | Tragic 43.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.09 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.8% | Tragic 43.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Average 31.7% | Poor 33.3% |
Finnish vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 196.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 63.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 58.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 18.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 43.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 58.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Finnish | Ecuadorian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 22.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.4% | Tragic 77.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.3% | Tragic 42.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.3% | Tragic 14.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 4.5% |
Finnish vs Ecuadorian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Finnish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 102.4%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 24.5%), and college, under 1 year (66.9% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (14.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 1.2%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.6%).
Education Level Metric | Finnish | Ecuadorian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Tragic 3.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 96.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 96.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 95.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 93.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 91.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.8% | Tragic 90.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Tragic 89.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.4% | Tragic 88.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.7% | Tragic 85.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.2% | Tragic 81.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 66.9% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Good 60.2% | Tragic 54.3% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.3% | Tragic 43.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 36.7% | Tragic 35.4% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.2% | Poor 14.0% |
Professional Degree | Poor 4.2% | Tragic 3.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Average 1.8% | Tragic 1.5% |
Finnish vs Ecuadorian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 46.9%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 45.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.3%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.8%).
Disability Metric | Finnish | Ecuadorian |
Disability | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.0% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 22.9% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Good 2.1% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Average 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.2% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Good 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |