Fijian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,136,847 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.140. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 44.3 Immigrants from Middle Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($35,114 compared to $37,965, a difference of 8.1%), median earnings ($40,193 compared to $43,416, a difference of 8.0%), and median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $49,201, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 2.4%), householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $58,375, a difference of 2.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $82,254, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 10.4%), single male poverty (13.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 8.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.11%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 37.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 18.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 0.96%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 20.6%), married-couple households (46.1% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 10.2%), and births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.24%), average family size (3.36 compared to 3.25, a difference of 3.3%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 35.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 22.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.74%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 67.6%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 43.7%), and master's degree (10.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.050%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 27.8%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.87%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 4.1%).