Fijian vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,201,406 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.357. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.078% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 78.1 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 19.7%), median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $48,669, a difference of 6.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $54,133, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($87,387 compared to $88,209, a difference of 0.94%), median female earnings ($35,114 compared to $34,742, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,187 compared to $86,125, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 25.3%), single male poverty (13.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 16.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.19%), receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 51.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 26.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.78%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.5%), births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 13.6%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.3% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.4%), married-couple households (46.1% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (65.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 22.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 42.6%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 28.7%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.80%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.80%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 48.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 22.5%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.4%).