Ecuadorian vs Immigrants Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Immigrants
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ecuadorians
Immigrants
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,042
SOCIAL INDEX
28.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
235th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants Integration in Ecuadorian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,845,342 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.351. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.444% in Immigrants. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 443.6 Immigrants.
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 9.7%), householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $59,656, a difference of 8.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $99,943, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $39,328, a difference of 0.54%), householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $53,201, a difference of 1.3%), and per capita income ($41,958 compared to $43,010, a difference of 2.5%).
Income Metric | Ecuadorian | Immigrants |
Per Capita Income | Poor $41,958 | Fair $43,010 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $95,114 | Fair $100,962 |
Median Household Income | Poor $82,070 | Good $85,818 |
Median Earnings | Poor $45,214 | Average $46,478 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,596 | Average $54,168 |
Median Female Earnings | Fair $39,117 | Fair $39,328 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,911 | Exceptional $53,201 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $91,574 | Average $94,423 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $93,739 | Average $99,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,958 | Fair $59,656 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.9% | Excellent 25.1% |
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 14.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 12.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 1.1%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.3%).
Poverty Metric | Ecuadorian | Immigrants |
Poverty | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 13.2% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 10.0% |
Males | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 12.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.3% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.3% | Poor 14.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.2% | Tragic 18.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 17.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.3% | Tragic 17.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Good 12.7% |
Single Females | Poor 21.6% | Fair 21.4% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.8% | Poor 29.7% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 12.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 13.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.9% | Tragic 13.0% |
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Ecuadorian | Immigrants |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.5% |
Males | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 5.7% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.5% | Tragic 18.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Good 8.6% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.9% | Fair 7.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Fair 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.56%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.37%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ecuadorian | Immigrants |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Excellent 65.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.4% | Tragic 79.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.4% | Tragic 34.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.4% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Poor 84.4% | Tragic 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.2% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.3% | Tragic 82.1% |
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (43.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 6.6%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and currently married (43.6% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.28%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.33, a difference of 0.40%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 1.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Ecuadorian | Immigrants |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Exceptional 66.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.8% | Exceptional 28.9% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.5% | Average 46.3% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Exceptional 3.33 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 6.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.6% | Poor 45.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.3% | Fair 32.7% |
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 95.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 51.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 15.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 30.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 42.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ecuadorian | Immigrants |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 22.8% | Tragic 11.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 77.9% | Good 90.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 42.0% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Excellent 20.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 25.3%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 11.3%), and no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (93.6% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.020%), 7th grade (94.0% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and 4th grade (96.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.090%).
Education Level Metric | Ecuadorian | Immigrants |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 2.8% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.1% | Tragic 97.2% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 97.2% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 97.2% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Tragic 97.1% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Tragic 96.9% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Tragic 96.5% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Tragic 96.2% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Tragic 95.7% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.0% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.6% | Tragic 93.6% |
9th Grade | Tragic 91.9% | Tragic 92.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.6% | Tragic 91.0% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.6% | Tragic 89.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.0% | Tragic 88.2% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.1% | Tragic 85.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.7% | Tragic 82.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Tragic 62.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.3% | Tragic 57.0% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.0% | Poor 44.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.4% | Fair 36.7% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.0% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.9% | Average 4.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Average 1.8% |
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 13.1%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 8.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.090%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 0.28%).
Disability Metric | Ecuadorian | Immigrants |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Excellent 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.6% | Fair 23.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.4% | Tragic 48.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.5% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Average 17.2% | Good 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Excellent 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Poor 2.5% |