Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Russia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Immigrants from Russia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ecuadorians
Immigrants from Russia
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,989
SOCIAL INDEX
77.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
94th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Russia Integration in Ecuadorian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 251,951,457 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.129. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Russia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 4.3 Immigrants from Russia.
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Russia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,958 compared to $52,044, a difference of 24.0%), median family income ($95,114 compared to $116,942, a difference of 23.0%), and median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $63,326, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $55,891, a difference of 3.7%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $44,680, a difference of 14.2%), and wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 15.1%).
Income Metric | Ecuadorian | Immigrants from Russia |
Per Capita Income | Poor $41,958 | Exceptional $52,044 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $95,114 | Exceptional $116,942 |
Median Household Income | Poor $82,070 | Exceptional $96,378 |
Median Earnings | Poor $45,214 | Exceptional $53,457 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,596 | Exceptional $63,326 |
Median Female Earnings | Fair $39,117 | Exceptional $44,680 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,911 | Exceptional $55,891 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $91,574 | Exceptional $108,751 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $93,739 | Exceptional $113,215 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,958 | Exceptional $64,512 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.9% | Poor 26.4% |
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Russia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 37.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 31.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.6%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 6.7%).
Poverty Metric | Ecuadorian | Immigrants from Russia |
Poverty | Tragic 14.0% | Excellent 11.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.7% | Excellent 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.3% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Exceptional 19.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.2% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Poor 21.6% | Exceptional 19.4% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Exceptional 15.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.8% | Exceptional 27.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.5% | Good 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 11.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 13.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.9% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Russia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.8%), female unemployment (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Ecuadorian | Immigrants from Russia |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 6.2% | Average 5.3% |
Females | Tragic 6.3% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.3% | Fair 11.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.5% | Tragic 18.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.8% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.4% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Good 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.3% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.8% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Excellent 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Good 8.6% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.9% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.5% | Excellent 5.2% |
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Russia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.65%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ecuadorian | Immigrants from Russia |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Good 65.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.4% | Exceptional 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.4% | Tragic 34.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.4% | Tragic 73.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Excellent 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Poor 84.4% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.2% | Exceptional 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.3% | Exceptional 83.2% |
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Russia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 30.9%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 22.6%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.8%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 3.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Ecuadorian | Immigrants from Russia |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Tragic 63.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.8% | Tragic 26.8% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.5% | Good 47.0% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.6% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.3% | Exceptional 27.1% |
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Russia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 50.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 20.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 9.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 19.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ecuadorian | Immigrants from Russia |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 22.8% | Tragic 15.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 77.9% | Tragic 85.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 42.0% | Tragic 50.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 16.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 5.3% |
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Russia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 72.7%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 54.1%), and no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.97%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.97%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.98%).
Education Level Metric | Ecuadorian | Immigrants from Russia |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.0% | Good 2.0% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.1% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.0% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Good 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Good 97.8% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Good 97.6% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Good 97.4% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Good 97.1% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.0% | Good 96.2% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.6% | Excellent 96.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 91.9% | Excellent 95.2% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.6% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.6% | Exceptional 93.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.0% | Exceptional 92.2% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.1% | Exceptional 90.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.7% | Exceptional 87.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.3% | Exceptional 64.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.0% | Exceptional 53.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.4% | Exceptional 45.4% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.0% | Exceptional 19.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.9% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Russia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 15.9%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.69%), male disability (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.79%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.83%).
Disability Metric | Ecuadorian | Immigrants from Russia |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.6% | Exceptional 21.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.4% | Good 47.0% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.5% | Good 2.9% |
Cognitive | Average 17.2% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Poor 2.5% |