Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Afghanistan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,937,697 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Afghanistan within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.348. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Immigrants from Afghanistan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 10.8 Immigrants from Afghanistan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Afghanistan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $67,007, a difference of 21.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $108,785, a difference of 16.1%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $108,709, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $57,478, a difference of 6.6%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 6.7%), and per capita income ($41,958 compared to $44,790, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Afghanistan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 39.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 39.0%), and receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.11%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 6.7%), and single female poverty (21.6% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Afghanistan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 31.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 28.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Afghanistan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Afghanistan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 15.9%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.32, a difference of 0.010%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Afghanistan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 180.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 59.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 51.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 18.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 39.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 51.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Afghanistan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 25.0%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 13.9%), and college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.26%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Afghanistan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.91%, a difference of 20.6%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 11.0%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.10%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.36%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.4%).