Czechoslovakian vs Malaysian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Malaysian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Malaysians
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,136
SOCIAL INDEX
28.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
232nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Malaysian Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,393,802 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.552. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.371% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 370.8 Malaysians.
Czechoslovakian vs Malaysian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 12.6%), per capita income ($43,806 compared to $39,194, a difference of 11.8%), and median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $50,772, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $51,615, a difference of 0.76%), median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $37,298, a difference of 3.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $58,244, a difference of 4.0%).
Income Metric | Czechoslovakian | Malaysian |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,806 | Tragic $39,194 |
Median Family Income | Average $103,273 | Tragic $95,230 |
Median Household Income | Average $84,965 | Tragic $81,064 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,658 | Tragic $43,844 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,382 | Tragic $50,772 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,738 | Tragic $37,298 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,224 | Poor $51,615 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Average $95,070 | Tragic $88,291 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $101,387 | Tragic $94,517 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $60,581 | Tragic $58,244 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.2% | Excellent 25.0% |
Czechoslovakian vs Malaysian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 23.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.0%), and family poverty (8.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 0.11%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and single female poverty (21.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 4.0%).
Poverty Metric | Czechoslovakian | Malaysian |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 13.1% |
Families | Exceptional 8.0% | Poor 9.6% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 12.0% |
Females | Exceptional 12.4% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 20.0% | Good 19.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.7% | Tragic 14.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.8% | Tragic 18.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 17.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Tragic 17.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Tragic 17.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.4% | Good 12.6% |
Single Females | Fair 21.3% | Tragic 22.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.1% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.7% | Poor 29.7% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.9% | Excellent 11.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 12.7% |
Czechoslovakian vs Malaysian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.5%), unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.79%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.94%).
Unemployment Metric | Czechoslovakian | Malaysian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Average 5.3% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Fair 5.3% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.5% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.7% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Average 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.6% | Fair 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.4% | Poor 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Fair 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.1% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Fair 5.5% |
Czechoslovakian vs Malaysian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.49%).
Labor Participation Metric | Czechoslovakian | Malaysian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.3% | Exceptional 66.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.5% | Fair 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.9% | Exceptional 39.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.5% | Exceptional 77.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.6% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Tragic 82.0% |
Czechoslovakian vs Malaysian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 24.2%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 17.5%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.82%), family households (64.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Czechoslovakian | Malaysian |
Family Households | Excellent 64.6% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Exceptional 29.8% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.5% | Average 46.3% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Exceptional 3.31 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.3% | Tragic 2.7% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 7.3% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.8% | Poor 45.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Poor 12.3% | Tragic 12.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.0% | Tragic 33.9% |
Czechoslovakian vs Malaysian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 7.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Czechoslovakian | Malaysian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.8% | Exceptional 59.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.7% | Exceptional 22.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Czechoslovakian vs Malaysian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 70.7%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 24.0%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
Education Level Metric | Czechoslovakian | Malaysian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Tragic 2.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.5% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 96.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 94.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Tragic 94.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Tragic 93.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.1% | Tragic 92.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Tragic 90.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Tragic 89.2% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Tragic 87.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.4% | Tragic 83.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 65.8% | Tragic 62.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Tragic 55.6% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.0% | Tragic 41.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.0% | Tragic 32.9% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.5% | Tragic 12.0% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.2% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.5% |
Czechoslovakian vs Malaysian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 16.9%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 11.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability (12.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.8%).
Disability Metric | Czechoslovakian | Malaysian |
Disability | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 11.8% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Poor 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 23.0% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.6% | Tragic 49.0% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Fair 6.2% |
Self-Care | Average 2.5% | Tragic 2.5% |