Czechoslovakian vs Icelander Community Comparison
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Icelander
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Icelanders
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,070
SOCIAL INDEX
78.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
89th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Icelander Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,891,342 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.692. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.635% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 635.3 Icelanders.
Czechoslovakian vs Icelander Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,806 compared to $44,987, a difference of 2.7%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $61,270, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $51,247, a difference of 0.050%), median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $55,415, a difference of 0.060%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $95,560, a difference of 0.51%).
Income Metric | Czechoslovakian | Icelander |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,806 | Excellent $44,987 |
Median Family Income | Average $103,273 | Good $104,282 |
Median Household Income | Average $84,965 | Good $85,797 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,658 | Good $46,916 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,382 | Good $55,415 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,738 | Fair $39,109 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,224 | Tragic $51,247 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Average $95,070 | Good $95,560 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $101,387 | Good $102,261 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $60,581 | Average $61,270 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.2% | Tragic 27.5% |
Czechoslovakian vs Icelander Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (17.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 17.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 8.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 0.72%), single female poverty (21.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.3% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 1.5%).
Poverty Metric | Czechoslovakian | Icelander |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Good 11.9% |
Families | Exceptional 8.0% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Good 11.0% |
Females | Exceptional 12.4% | Excellent 13.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 20.0% | Tragic 21.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.7% | Good 13.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.8% | Excellent 16.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Excellent 15.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Excellent 15.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Excellent 15.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.4% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Fair 21.3% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.1% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.7% | Fair 29.5% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.9% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Czechoslovakian vs Icelander Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 34.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.070%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.96%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Czechoslovakian | Icelander |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.5% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.7% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Excellent 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Average 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Exceptional 6.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.1% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Czechoslovakian vs Icelander Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 0.80%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.27%).
Labor Participation Metric | Czechoslovakian | Icelander |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.3% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.5% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.9% | Exceptional 40.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.5% | Exceptional 76.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.8% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.6% | Tragic 84.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Average 82.8% |
Czechoslovakian vs Icelander Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 5.7%), married-couple households (48.5% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.33%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Czechoslovakian | Icelander |
Family Households | Excellent 64.6% | Tragic 63.3% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.5% | Good 47.0% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.3% | Good 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.9% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.8% | Excellent 47.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Poor 12.3% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.0% | Excellent 30.3% |
Czechoslovakian vs Icelander Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 22.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 3.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Czechoslovakian | Icelander |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 9.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 90.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.8% | Exceptional 58.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.7% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Czechoslovakian vs Icelander Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.6%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.8%), and no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.13%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.13%).
Education Level Metric | Czechoslovakian | Icelander |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.1% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Exceptional 93.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Exceptional 92.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Exceptional 90.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.4% | Exceptional 87.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 65.8% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Exceptional 62.1% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.0% | Exceptional 48.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.0% | Excellent 39.5% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.5% | Good 15.5% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Czechoslovakian vs Icelander Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 25.2%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 11.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.33%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.1%).
Disability Metric | Czechoslovakian | Icelander |
Disability | Tragic 12.5% | Fair 11.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.3% | Poor 11.6% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Excellent 12.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Poor 5.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 11.8% | Fair 11.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 23.0% | Average 23.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.6% | Exceptional 46.7% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Good 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Self-Care | Average 2.5% | Exceptional 2.4% |