Czechoslovakian vs Ghanaian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Ghanaian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Ghanaians
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,403
SOCIAL INDEX
21.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
261st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ghanaian Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 154,664,573 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.223% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 222.9 Ghanaians.
Czechoslovakian vs Ghanaian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 26.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $90,137, a difference of 5.5%), and median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $52,810, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($46,658 compared to $46,440, a difference of 0.47%), householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $60,043, a difference of 0.90%), and median household income ($84,965 compared to $83,582, a difference of 1.7%).
Income Metric | Czechoslovakian | Ghanaian |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,806 | Poor $42,164 |
Median Family Income | Average $103,273 | Poor $98,877 |
Median Household Income | Average $84,965 | Fair $83,582 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,658 | Average $46,440 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,382 | Poor $52,810 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,738 | Excellent $40,429 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,224 | Good $52,594 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Average $95,070 | Tragic $90,137 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $101,387 | Poor $97,277 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $60,581 | Fair $60,043 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Czechoslovakian vs Ghanaian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 35.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 31.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.95%), single female poverty (21.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
Poverty Metric | Czechoslovakian | Ghanaian |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 13.9% |
Families | Exceptional 8.0% | Tragic 10.3% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.4% | Tragic 14.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 20.0% | Tragic 20.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.7% | Tragic 14.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.8% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 18.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Tragic 18.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Tragic 18.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 13.3% |
Single Females | Fair 21.3% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.1% | Poor 16.7% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.7% | Fair 29.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 12.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 14.0% |
Czechoslovakian vs Ghanaian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 25.4%), female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 24.1%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 5.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Czechoslovakian | Ghanaian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.0% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.1% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.5% | Tragic 19.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 11.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.7% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.6% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Tragic 8.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.1% | Tragic 9.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.2% |
Czechoslovakian vs Ghanaian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 18.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.41%).
Labor Participation Metric | Czechoslovakian | Ghanaian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.3% | Exceptional 67.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.5% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.9% | Tragic 35.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.5% | Tragic 74.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.8% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.6% | Exceptional 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Good 83.0% |
Czechoslovakian vs Ghanaian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 33.3%), married-couple households (48.5% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 14.9%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.6%), family households (64.6% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Czechoslovakian | Ghanaian |
Family Households | Excellent 64.6% | Tragic 63.5% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.5% | Tragic 42.2% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Exceptional 3.29 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.3% | Poor 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 7.8% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.8% | Tragic 42.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Poor 12.3% | Average 12.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.0% | Tragic 34.3% |
Czechoslovakian vs Ghanaian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 110.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 35.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 10.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 24.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 32.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Czechoslovakian | Ghanaian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 16.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 83.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.8% | Tragic 48.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.7% | Tragic 16.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.1% | Tragic 5.2% |
Czechoslovakian vs Ghanaian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 57.8%), master's degree (14.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and ged/equivalency (87.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (46.0% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 0.37%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.0%).
Education Level Metric | Czechoslovakian | Ghanaian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Tragic 2.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 96.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 95.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Tragic 94.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.1% | Tragic 92.8% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Tragic 91.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Tragic 90.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Tragic 87.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.4% | Tragic 84.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 65.8% | Poor 63.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Fair 58.4% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.0% | Fair 45.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.0% | Average 38.0% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.5% | Good 15.5% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.2% | Fair 4.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Average 1.8% |
Czechoslovakian vs Ghanaian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 39.3%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 25.2%), and male disability (12.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.020%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.63%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
Disability Metric | Czechoslovakian | Ghanaian |
Disability | Tragic 12.5% | Excellent 11.5% |
Males | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Average 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 11.8% | Poor 11.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 23.0% | Poor 24.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.6% | Fair 47.5% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 18.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Good 6.0% |
Self-Care | Average 2.5% | Average 2.5% |