Crow vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison
COMPARE
Crow
Immigrants from China
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Crow
Immigrants from China
2,555
SOCIAL INDEX
23.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
251st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from China Integration in Crow Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,317,187 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.751. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.585% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 585.2 Immigrants from China.
Crow vs Immigrants from China Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $54,264, a difference of 71.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,337 compared to $119,756, a difference of 67.9%), and median household income ($63,681 compared to $105,335, a difference of 65.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $57,931, a difference of 23.2%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $46,972, a difference of 33.2%), and wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 40.0%).
Income Metric | Crow | Immigrants from China |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $31,729 | Exceptional $54,264 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $76,605 | Exceptional $125,540 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,681 | Exceptional $105,335 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,707 | Exceptional $56,638 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,434 | Exceptional $67,353 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,266 | Exceptional $46,972 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,012 | Exceptional $57,931 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $71,337 | Exceptional $119,756 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $74,257 | Exceptional $122,178 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $49,234 | Exceptional $69,174 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 19.1% | Poor 26.7% |
Crow vs Immigrants from China Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 127.9%), family poverty (16.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 105.6%), and single male poverty (23.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 104.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 20.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 32.6%), and receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 40.4%).
Poverty Metric | Crow | Immigrants from China |
Poverty | Tragic 20.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Tragic 19.1% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 22.1% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 33.2% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 22.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 31.0% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 26.0% | Exceptional 13.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 26.4% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 23.3% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 32.4% | Exceptional 18.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 30.3% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 26.1% |
Married Couples | Tragic 9.6% | Excellent 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 11.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 13.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Crow vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 256.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 223.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 221.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 20.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Crow | Immigrants from China |
Unemployment | Tragic 11.1% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 10.6% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 12.1% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 20.1% | Average 11.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 26.2% | Good 17.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 18.7% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 15.4% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 10.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 15.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 13.7% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 17.4% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 16.9% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Crow vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 23.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 12.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 7.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Crow | Immigrants from China |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 60.8% | Excellent 65.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 73.3% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.5% | Tragic 31.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.9% | Tragic 71.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 78.6% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 75.9% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 76.5% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.3% | Exceptional 83.2% |
Crow vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 90.4%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 63.5%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 47.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.32%), family households (65.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.89%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 17.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Crow | Immigrants from China |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.3% | Excellent 64.7% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.4% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.4% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.82 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 40.4% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 40.4% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Crow vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 37.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 29.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 23.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Crow | Immigrants from China |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 11.0% | Tragic 15.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Fair 89.3% | Tragic 84.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Good 55.7% | Tragic 51.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.5% | Tragic 18.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Poor 6.0% |
Crow vs Immigrants from China Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 113.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 109.0%), and master's degree (10.6% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 99.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.68%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.99%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 1.4%).
Education Level Metric | Crow | Immigrants from China |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Tragic 2.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 99.7% | Tragic 97.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 99.7% | Tragic 97.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 99.6% | Tragic 97.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 99.6% | Tragic 97.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 99.6% | Tragic 97.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 99.6% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 99.5% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 99.4% | Tragic 96.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 99.1% | Tragic 95.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 99.0% | Tragic 95.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Tragic 94.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Tragic 93.2% |
11th Grade | Excellent 92.9% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.0% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 86.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.2% | Exceptional 70.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.5% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.6% | Exceptional 55.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 27.7% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 3.1% |
Crow vs Immigrants from China Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 68.0%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 58.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.5%), disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.0%).
Disability Metric | Crow | Immigrants from China |
Disability | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Exceptional 0.96% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.9% | Exceptional 20.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.6% | Exceptional 46.3% |
Vision | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Fair 17.3% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Self-Care | Poor 2.5% | Exceptional 2.3% |