Creek vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Creek
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Creek
Tsimshian
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in Creek Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 11,845,786 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.400. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.100% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 100.0 Tsimshian.
Creek vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $97,809, a difference of 30.7%), median household income ($67,715 compared to $83,346, a difference of 23.1%), and median family income ($82,560 compared to $101,543, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $48,836, a difference of 4.8%), median earnings ($39,648 compared to $43,695, a difference of 10.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $58,202, a difference of 12.0%).
Income Metric | Creek | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,546 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,560 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $67,715 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,648 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,594 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,437 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,371 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $74,847 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $78,960 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $51,949 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.1% | Exceptional 23.9% |
Creek vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (21.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 89.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 64.3%), and single father poverty (19.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 56.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.4%), married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.7%), and male poverty (14.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 10.2%).
Poverty Metric | Creek | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Tragic 11.7% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 17.0% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.2% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 19.2% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 24.2% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.7% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 27.4% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 36.7% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 10.9% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 15.7% |
Creek vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 110.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 84.7%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.74%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.74%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Creek | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.6% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Poor 4.6% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Poor 4.9% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.9% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.8% | Poor 5.6% |
Creek vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 4.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Creek | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.3% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.1% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.1% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 80.7% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 80.4% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.0% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.7% | Tragic 77.4% |
Creek vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.9%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 12.2%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (46.0% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 3.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Creek | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Fair 64.2% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.4% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.3% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Poor 46.0% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.6% | Tragic 42.2% |
Creek vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 14.8%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.96%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 10.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Creek | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.3% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.9% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.2% | Fair 6.2% |
Creek vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in college, 1 year or more (52.2% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 11.0%), college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 8.5%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (28.9% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 0.35%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.45%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
Education Level Metric | Creek | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Average 92.4% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.3% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.6% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 52.2% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.6% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.9% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.5% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.4% |
Creek vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 46.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 22.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.13%), male disability (15.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.97%).
Disability Metric | Creek | Tsimshian |
Disability | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Tragic 15.5% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.9% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.4% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.3% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.5% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.6% |