Creek vs Czech Community Comparison
COMPARE
Creek
Czech
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Creek
Czechs
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Czech Integration in Creek Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,223,548 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.068. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 5.3 Czechs.
Creek vs Czech Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Czech communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $103,507, a difference of 31.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $96,525, a difference of 29.0%), and median family income ($82,560 compared to $105,839, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 7.5%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $51,421, a difference of 13.3%), and median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $38,992, a difference of 16.6%).
Income Metric | Creek | Czech |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,546 | Good $44,595 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,560 | Excellent $105,839 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $67,715 | Good $86,164 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,648 | Good $47,221 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,594 | Excellent $56,546 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,437 | Poor $38,992 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,371 | Poor $51,421 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $74,847 | Good $96,525 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $78,960 | Excellent $103,507 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $51,949 | Average $61,244 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 29.2% |
Creek vs Czech Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Czech communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 57.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 56.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 55.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 9.6%), single father poverty (19.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 16.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 18.7%).
Poverty Metric | Creek | Czech |
Poverty | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Families | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Males | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Females | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.2% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 19.2% | Exceptional 12.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 24.2% | Exceptional 15.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Exceptional 13.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.7% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 13.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 27.4% | Average 21.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 17.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 36.7% | Good 28.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 10.9% | Exceptional 9.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Creek vs Czech Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 30.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 29.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 3.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Creek | Czech |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 9.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.6% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Poor 4.6% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 9.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.9% | Average 7.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Creek vs Czech Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 6.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Creek | Czech |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.3% | Excellent 65.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.1% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.1% | Exceptional 43.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 78.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 80.7% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 80.4% | Exceptional 85.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.0% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.7% | Exceptional 83.9% |
Creek vs Czech Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 24.4%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 23.1%), and divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.46%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.58%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.11, a difference of 2.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Creek | Czech |
Family Households | Fair 64.2% | Good 64.5% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.4% | Good 27.5% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.3% | Exceptional 49.4% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Good 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Poor 46.0% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.4% | Good 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.6% | Excellent 30.5% |
Creek vs Czech Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 13.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 5.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 1.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 2.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Creek | Czech |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 6.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 93.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.3% | Exceptional 61.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.9% | Exceptional 22.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Creek vs Czech Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Czech communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 41.3%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 40.2%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.17%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.17%).
Education Level Metric | Creek | Czech |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 97.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 96.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Average 92.4% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 93.2% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.3% | Exceptional 91.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.6% | Exceptional 88.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Exceptional 67.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 52.2% | Excellent 60.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.6% | Good 47.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.9% | Average 38.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.5% | Average 14.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.1% | Average 4.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Good 1.9% |
Creek vs Czech Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Czech communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 52.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 49.6%), and ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 6.2%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 11.5%), and disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 12.7%).
Disability Metric | Creek | Czech |
Disability | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 12.0% |
Males | Tragic 15.5% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Tragic 15.7% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.9% | Average 11.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 22.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.5% | Exceptional 45.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Excellent 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.4% | Tragic 3.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.3% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.5% | Excellent 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.3% |