Choctaw vs Slavic Community Comparison
COMPARE
Choctaw
Slavic
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Choctaw
Slavs
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,593
SOCIAL INDEX
73.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
111th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Slavic Integration in Choctaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,435,348 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.472. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.066% in Slavs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 65.5 Slavs.
Choctaw vs Slavic Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,999 compared to $45,049, a difference of 25.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $102,629, a difference of 24.7%), and median family income ($84,835 compared to $105,144, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.5%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $50,563, a difference of 11.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $61,709, a difference of 16.3%).
Income Metric | Choctaw | Slavic |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,999 | Excellent $45,049 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $84,835 | Good $105,144 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $69,947 | Good $86,398 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,270 | Excellent $47,470 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,729 | Excellent $56,390 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,775 | Average $39,613 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,450 | Tragic $50,563 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $78,168 | Good $96,377 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,287 | Good $102,629 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,060 | Good $61,709 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.1% | Tragic 27.4% |
Choctaw vs Slavic Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 43.5%), married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 41.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 16.5%), and single father poverty (20.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 19.4%).
Poverty Metric | Choctaw | Slavic |
Poverty | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Families | Tragic 11.6% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.3% | Excellent 19.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.1% | Good 13.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.5% | Good 17.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Excellent 15.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.3% | Excellent 15.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.1% | Excellent 15.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 13.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 27.2% | Average 21.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 20.7% | Tragic 17.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 36.4% | Fair 29.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.4% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Choctaw vs Slavic Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 26.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Choctaw | Slavic |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Fair 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Good 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Excellent 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.8% | Fair 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.9% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Excellent 5.2% |
Choctaw vs Slavic Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 5.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Choctaw | Slavic |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.5% | Tragic 64.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.4% | Average 79.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Exceptional 40.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.7% | Exceptional 76.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.0% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.4% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.5% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.2% | Good 82.9% |
Choctaw vs Slavic Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.7%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 20.0%), and births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.13, a difference of 2.8%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 4.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Choctaw | Slavic |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Poor 64.0% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Tragic 26.8% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.0% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.21 | Tragic 3.13 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Excellent 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.3% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.1% | Poor 12.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.9% | Average 31.6% |
Choctaw vs Slavic Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.8%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 13.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 12.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Choctaw | Slavic |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.2% | Exceptional 91.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.3% | Exceptional 57.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.0% | Exceptional 20.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Excellent 6.6% |
Choctaw vs Slavic Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 40.9%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 40.5%), and bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.14%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.15%).
Education Level Metric | Choctaw | Slavic |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.2% | Exceptional 96.8% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.1% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Exceptional 95.2% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Exceptional 94.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.8% | Exceptional 92.8% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.8% | Exceptional 91.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.1% | Exceptional 87.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Excellent 66.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 52.3% | Excellent 60.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.8% | Excellent 47.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 29.4% | Good 38.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.0% | Good 15.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Good 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Good 1.9% |
Choctaw vs Slavic Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 51.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 40.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.6%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 14.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 16.6%).
Disability Metric | Choctaw | Slavic |
Disability | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 12.4% |
Males | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 12.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 1.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.4% | Poor 11.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Good 23.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 52.7% | Exceptional 46.1% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Average 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.4% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 6.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Fair 2.5% |