Choctaw vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Choctaw
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Choctaw
Chinese
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Choctaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,816,062 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.750. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.762% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 762.0 Chinese.
![Choctaw Integration in Chinese Communities](/correlation-charts/comparison/choctaw-vs-chinese/choctaw-vs-chinese-community-integration.webp)
Choctaw vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $77,465, a difference of 46.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $116,156, a difference of 41.2%), and median household income ($69,947 compared to $98,496, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 8.6%), median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $56,872, a difference of 19.2%), and median earnings ($40,270 compared to $48,836, a difference of 21.3%).
![Choctaw vs Chinese Income](/correlation-charts/comparison/choctaw-vs-chinese/choctaw-vs-chinese-income.webp)
Income Metric | Choctaw | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,999 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $84,835 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $69,947 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,270 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,729 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,775 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,450 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $78,168 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,287 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,060 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.1% | Average 25.9% |
Choctaw vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 79.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 79.8%), and family poverty (11.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 78.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (20.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 34.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 36.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 38.2%).
![Choctaw vs Chinese Poverty](/correlation-charts/comparison/choctaw-vs-chinese/choctaw-vs-chinese-poverty.webp)
Poverty Metric | Choctaw | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Tragic 11.6% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.3% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.5% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.3% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.1% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 20.7% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 36.4% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.4% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.5% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Choctaw vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 49.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 44.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 7.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 13.3%).
![Choctaw vs Chinese Unemployment](/correlation-charts/comparison/choctaw-vs-chinese/choctaw-vs-chinese-unemployment.webp)
Unemployment Metric | Choctaw | Chinese |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.9% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Choctaw vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 4.2%).
![Choctaw vs Chinese Labor Participation](/correlation-charts/comparison/choctaw-vs-chinese/choctaw-vs-chinese-labor-force.webp)
Labor Participation Metric | Choctaw | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.5% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.4% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.7% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.0% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.4% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.5% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.2% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Choctaw vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 37.6%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 36.4%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.9%), family households (64.9% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and currently married (46.3% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 7.0%).
![Choctaw vs Chinese Family Structure](/correlation-charts/comparison/choctaw-vs-chinese/choctaw-vs-chinese-family-structure.webp)
Family Structure Metric | Choctaw | Chinese |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.0% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.21 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.3% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.9% | Excellent 30.2% |
Choctaw vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 13.5%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.42%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 3.8%).
![Choctaw vs Chinese Vehicle Availability](/correlation-charts/comparison/choctaw-vs-chinese/choctaw-vs-chinese-vehicle-availability.webp)
Vehicle Availability Metric | Choctaw | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.2% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.3% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.0% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Choctaw vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 38.2%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 32.1%), and bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.29%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.29%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.29%).
![Choctaw vs Chinese Education Level](/correlation-charts/comparison/choctaw-vs-chinese/choctaw-vs-chinese-education-level.webp)
Education Level Metric | Choctaw | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.2% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.1% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.8% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.8% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.1% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 52.3% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.8% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 29.4% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.0% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Fair 1.8% |
Choctaw vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 64.2%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 61.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 59.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 8.1%), cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 15.8%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.7%).
![Choctaw vs Chinese Disability](/correlation-charts/comparison/choctaw-vs-chinese/choctaw-vs-chinese-disability.webp)
Disability Metric | Choctaw | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.4% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 52.7% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 2.6% |