Chippewa vs Portuguese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Portuguese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Portuguese
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,363
SOCIAL INDEX
41.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
201st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Portuguese Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 191,517,141 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Portuguese within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.200. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Portuguese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 1.8 Portuguese.
Chippewa vs Portuguese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $88,976, a difference of 26.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $105,309, a difference of 25.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $99,429, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 9.6%), householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $61,440, a difference of 14.1%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $40,177, a difference of 14.8%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Portuguese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Good $44,362 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Excellent $106,286 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Exceptional $88,976 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Exceptional $48,032 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Excellent $56,663 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Good $40,177 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Exceptional $54,436 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Exceptional $99,429 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Exceptional $105,309 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Good $61,440 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Tragic 27.4% |
Chippewa vs Portuguese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 46.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 41.6%), and male poverty (14.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 15.2%), and single father poverty (18.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 16.1%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Portuguese |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Excellent 8.4% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Exceptional 17.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Average 13.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Excellent 16.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Excellent 15.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Fair 12.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Excellent 20.5% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Good 16.2% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Good 28.8% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Excellent 10.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Good 12.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Fair 12.2% |
Chippewa vs Portuguese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 66.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 31.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.90%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 3.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Portuguese |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Fair 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Fair 11.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Good 17.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 4.8% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Tragic 10.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 8.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Poor 5.6% |
Chippewa vs Portuguese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 0.83%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Portuguese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Tragic 64.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Tragic 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Exceptional 40.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Exceptional 76.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Fair 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 84.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Fair 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Tragic 82.2% |
Chippewa vs Portuguese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 26.1%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 25.0%), and single father households (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.40%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (62.1% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 6.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Portuguese |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Exceptional 65.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Fair 6.4% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Excellent 47.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Fair 12.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Tragic 33.8% |
Chippewa vs Portuguese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 10.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.98%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Portuguese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Exceptional 91.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Exceptional 58.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Exceptional 21.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Chippewa vs Portuguese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 28.9%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 22.0%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.17%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.58%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.58%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Portuguese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 97.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Average 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Fair 97.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Fair 97.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Poor 95.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Poor 95.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Tragic 94.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Poor 93.3% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Tragic 92.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Poor 90.6% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Poor 88.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Poor 85.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Tragic 63.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Tragic 57.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Tragic 44.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Tragic 35.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Poor 13.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Poor 4.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Fair 1.8% |
Chippewa vs Portuguese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 25.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.8% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.69%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 6.9%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Portuguese |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 12.6% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 12.3% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Fair 23.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Fair 47.6% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 3.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |