Chippewa vs Immigrants Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Immigrants
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Immigrants
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,042
SOCIAL INDEX
28.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
235th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 10,053,926 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.211. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Immigrants. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 20.5 Immigrants.
Chippewa vs Immigrants Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $85,818, a difference of 21.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $99,943, a difference of 19.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $94,423, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 0.59%), householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $59,656, a difference of 10.8%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $39,328, a difference of 12.3%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Fair $43,010 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Fair $100,962 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Good $85,818 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Average $46,478 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Average $54,168 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Fair $39,328 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Exceptional $53,201 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Average $94,423 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Average $99,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Fair $59,656 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Excellent 25.1% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 34.1%), single male poverty (16.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 29.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.9%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 13.2% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Tragic 10.0% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 12.0% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Poor 14.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Tragic 18.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Tragic 17.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 17.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Good 12.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Fair 21.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Poor 29.7% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 12.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 13.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 13.0% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 70.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 36.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.5% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 5.7% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Tragic 18.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Fair 7.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Fair 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 26.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Excellent 65.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Tragic 79.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Tragic 34.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Tragic 82.1% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 30.4%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 26.0%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.33, a difference of 4.0%), currently married (43.2% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and family households (62.1% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 6.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Exceptional 66.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Exceptional 28.9% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Average 46.3% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Exceptional 3.33 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Poor 45.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Fair 32.7% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 23.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.69%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 7.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 11.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Good 90.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Excellent 20.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 70.5%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 28.2%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (62.6% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Tragic 2.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.9% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 95.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 93.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Tragic 92.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Tragic 91.0% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Tragic 89.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Tragic 88.2% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Tragic 85.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Tragic 82.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Tragic 62.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Tragic 57.0% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Poor 44.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Fair 36.7% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Average 4.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Average 1.8% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 58.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 45.3%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.56%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.1%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Excellent 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Fair 23.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Tragic 48.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Good 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Excellent 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Poor 2.5% |