Chippewa vs Hmong Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Hmong
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Hmong
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Hmong Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 21,986,272 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.692. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.032% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 32.1 Hmong.
Chippewa vs Hmong Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 10.9%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $75,839, a difference of 7.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $84,258, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $35,498, a difference of 1.4%), per capita income ($36,631 compared to $38,120, a difference of 4.1%), and median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $48,254, a difference of 4.1%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Hmong |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Tragic $38,120 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Tragic $91,296 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Tragic $75,839 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Tragic $42,111 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Tragic $48,254 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Tragic $35,498 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Tragic $49,364 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Tragic $84,258 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Tragic $88,115 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Tragic $56,339 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Tragic 27.7% |
Chippewa vs Hmong Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 34.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 29.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 9.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 11.3%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Hmong |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Poor 12.8% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Average 9.1% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Poor 11.6% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Fair 13.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Average 20.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Fair 13.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Tragic 18.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Poor 17.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Fair 16.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Poor 17.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 14.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Tragic 23.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 31.2% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Excellent 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Excellent 10.9% |
Chippewa vs Hmong Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 100.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 58.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 56.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 10.2%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 19.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Hmong |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 3.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Tragic 13.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Chippewa vs Hmong Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 13.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.96%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.55%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Hmong |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Tragic 64.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Tragic 77.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Exceptional 76.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 82.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Tragic 81.7% |
Chippewa vs Hmong Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 53.7%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 30.5%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.24%), family households (62.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 6.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Hmong |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Exceptional 64.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Exceptional 28.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Good 47.0% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Fair 3.21 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Fair 6.4% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Good 47.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Chippewa vs Hmong Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 9.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Hmong |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Average 10.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Average 89.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Exceptional 57.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Exceptional 21.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Chippewa vs Hmong Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 19.1%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 17.3%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.29%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.5% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.45%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Hmong |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Excellent 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Good 98.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Good 98.1% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Good 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Good 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Excellent 97.9% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 96.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Excellent 96.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Excellent 95.2% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Average 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Average 89.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Poor 84.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Tragic 63.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Tragic 57.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Tragic 43.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Tragic 34.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 13.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.6% |
Chippewa vs Hmong Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 66.3%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 16.4%), and male disability (14.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.48%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.4%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Hmong |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 12.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 12.5% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Tragic 25.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Tragic 48.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 3.4% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 18.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Excellent 2.4% |