Chippewa vs German Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,339,246 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of German Russians within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.092. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in German Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 4.5 German Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $40,266, a difference of 9.9%), median family income ($86,852 compared to $93,858, a difference of 8.1%), and median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $49,924, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 1.4%), householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $55,356, a difference of 2.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $45,673, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 24.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 24.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 2.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and single father poverty (18.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 62.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 55.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 29.7%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 28.8%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.27%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (62.1% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 11.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 17.9%), bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 17.2%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.5% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 0.24%), high school diploma (89.7% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and 12th grade, no diploma (91.5% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 22.0%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 21.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.81%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.9%).