Chinese vs Tongan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Tongan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Tongans
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,132
SOCIAL INDEX
68.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
130th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tongan Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,272,399 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tongans within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.391. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.152% in Tongans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 152.4 Tongans.
Chinese vs Tongan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $68,235, a difference of 13.5%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $41,693, a difference of 10.6%), and median family income ($116,188 compared to $105,967, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $56,972, a difference of 2.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,264 compared to $99,604, a difference of 4.7%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $93,076, a difference of 5.8%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Tongan |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Tragic $41,693 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Excellent $105,967 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Exceptional $93,076 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Fair $45,665 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Fair $53,218 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Tragic $38,288 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Exceptional $56,972 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Exceptional $99,604 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Exceptional $108,643 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Exceptional $68,235 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Tragic 27.5% |
Chinese vs Tongan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 30.0%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 26.1%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.86%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 5.1%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Tongan |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Exceptional 17.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Exceptional 18.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Exceptional 26.5% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 9.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Chinese vs Tongan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 75.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 38.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.87%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 1.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Tongan |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 10.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 6.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Chinese vs Tongan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 0.84%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Tongan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Exceptional 67.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Exceptional 80.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Exceptional 41.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Exceptional 77.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 83.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Excellent 83.1% |
Chinese vs Tongan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 27.7%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 20.1%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.0%), family households (68.1% compared to 69.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 2.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Tongan |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Exceptional 69.6% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Exceptional 31.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Exceptional 51.6% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Exceptional 3.49 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Exceptional 48.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Exceptional 28.4% |
Chinese vs Tongan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 14.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 13.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 11.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Tongan |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 7.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Exceptional 92.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Exceptional 63.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Exceptional 26.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Chinese vs Tongan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 54.5%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 20.1%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.83%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.84%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.84%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Tongan |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 95.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Tragic 95.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 94.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 93.3% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Poor 92.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Poor 90.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Tragic 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Fair 64.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Poor 57.8% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Tragic 43.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Tragic 34.3% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Tragic 12.5% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Poor 1.7% |
Chinese vs Tongan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 26.7%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.80%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.1%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Tongan |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Fair 23.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Tragic 48.3% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Good 2.9% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Tragic 17.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.2% |