Chinese vs Lebanese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Lebanese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Lebanese
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,328
SOCIAL INDEX
70.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
122nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Lebanese Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,965,962 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Lebanese within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.220. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.057% in Lebanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 56.8 Lebanese.
![Chinese Integration in Lebanese Communities](/correlation-charts/comparison/chinese-vs-lebanese/chinese-vs-lebanese-community-integration.webp)
Chinese vs Lebanese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $62,287, a difference of 24.4%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $50,355, a difference of 15.5%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $88,091, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($46,098 compared to $45,840, a difference of 0.56%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $57,409, a difference of 0.95%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $48,226, a difference of 1.3%).
![Chinese vs Lebanese Income](/correlation-charts/comparison/chinese-vs-lebanese/chinese-vs-lebanese-income.webp)
Income Metric | Chinese | Lebanese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Exceptional $45,840 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Exceptional $107,086 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Excellent $88,091 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Exceptional $48,226 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Exceptional $57,409 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Good $40,006 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Tragic $50,355 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Excellent $97,339 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Exceptional $104,734 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Good $62,287 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Tragic 27.9% |
Chinese vs Lebanese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 47.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 39.5%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 13.9%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 15.0%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 19.5%).
![Chinese vs Lebanese Poverty](/correlation-charts/comparison/chinese-vs-lebanese/chinese-vs-lebanese-poverty.webp)
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Lebanese |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Average 12.3% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Average 8.9% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Average 13.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Good 13.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Average 17.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Average 16.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Average 16.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Average 16.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 13.2% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Good 20.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Fair 29.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Good 11.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Excellent 11.1% |
Chinese vs Lebanese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 52.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.6%).
![Chinese vs Lebanese Unemployment](/correlation-charts/comparison/chinese-vs-lebanese/chinese-vs-lebanese-unemployment.webp)
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Lebanese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Average 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Average 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Poor 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Fair 7.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.4% |
Chinese vs Lebanese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.18%).
![Chinese vs Lebanese Labor Participation](/correlation-charts/comparison/chinese-vs-lebanese/chinese-vs-lebanese-labor-force.webp)
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Lebanese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Tragic 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Good 75.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 83.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Poor 82.5% |
Chinese vs Lebanese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.9%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.8%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 2.3%), currently married (49.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.19, a difference of 4.6%).
![Chinese vs Lebanese Family Structure](/correlation-charts/comparison/chinese-vs-lebanese/chinese-vs-lebanese-family-structure.webp)
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Lebanese |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Excellent 27.7% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Exceptional 29.5% |
Chinese vs Lebanese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 39.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 19.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.46%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 5.3%).
![Chinese vs Lebanese Vehicle Availability](/correlation-charts/comparison/chinese-vs-lebanese/chinese-vs-lebanese-vehicle-availability.webp)
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Lebanese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 8.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Exceptional 57.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Good 20.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Average 6.4% |
Chinese vs Lebanese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 26.8%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.3%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.40%).
![Chinese vs Lebanese Education Level](/correlation-charts/comparison/chinese-vs-lebanese/chinese-vs-lebanese-education-level.webp)
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Lebanese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 95.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 94.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 92.2% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Exceptional 90.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Exceptional 87.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Exceptional 67.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Exceptional 61.6% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Exceptional 48.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Exceptional 40.4% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Chinese vs Lebanese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 18.6%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 15.8%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.5%), disability (12.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 3.7%).
![Chinese vs Lebanese Disability](/correlation-charts/comparison/chinese-vs-lebanese/chinese-vs-lebanese-disability.webp)
Disability Metric | Chinese | Lebanese |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Fair 11.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Poor 11.5% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Average 12.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 5.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Average 11.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Exceptional 22.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Excellent 46.8% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Average 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Good 2.4% |