Chickasaw vs Slavic Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Slavic
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Slavs
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,593
SOCIAL INDEX
73.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
111th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Slavic Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,057,453 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.108. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Slavs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 14.4 Slavs.
![Chickasaw Integration in Slavic Communities](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-slavs/chickasaw-vs-slavs-community-integration.webp)
Chickasaw vs Slavic Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $102,629, a difference of 24.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $96,377, a difference of 23.7%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $45,049, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.0%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $50,563, a difference of 13.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $61,709, a difference of 14.8%).
![Chickasaw vs Slavic Income](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-slavs/chickasaw-vs-slavs-income.webp)
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Slavic |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Excellent $45,049 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Good $105,144 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Good $86,398 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Excellent $47,470 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Excellent $56,390 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Average $39,613 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $50,563 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Good $96,377 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Good $102,629 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Good $61,709 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 27.4% |
Chickasaw vs Slavic Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 33.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 30.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.8%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 9.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 9.5%).
![Chickasaw vs Slavic Poverty](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-slavs/chickasaw-vs-slavs-poverty.webp)
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Slavic |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Excellent 19.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Good 13.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Good 17.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Excellent 15.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Excellent 15.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Excellent 15.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 13.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Average 21.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 17.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Fair 29.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Chickasaw vs Slavic Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 24.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 15.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.88%).
![Chickasaw vs Slavic Unemployment](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-slavs/chickasaw-vs-slavs-unemployment.webp)
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Slavic |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Fair 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Good 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Excellent 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Fair 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Excellent 5.2% |
Chickasaw vs Slavic Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.8%).
![Chickasaw vs Slavic Labor Participation](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-slavs/chickasaw-vs-slavs-labor-force.webp)
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Slavic |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 64.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Average 79.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 40.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 76.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Good 82.9% |
Chickasaw vs Slavic Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 22.4%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 20.1%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.65%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.9%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.8%).
![Chickasaw vs Slavic Family Structure](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-slavs/chickasaw-vs-slavs-family-structure.webp)
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Slavic |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Poor 64.0% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 26.8% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.13 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Excellent 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Poor 12.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Average 31.6% |
Chickasaw vs Slavic Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 13.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 13.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 8.8%).
![Chickasaw vs Slavic Vehicle Availability](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-slavs/chickasaw-vs-slavs-vehicle-availability.webp)
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Slavic |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 57.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 20.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Excellent 6.6% |
Chickasaw vs Slavic Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 35.7%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 35.3%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.030%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.040%).
![Chickasaw vs Slavic Education Level](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-slavs/chickasaw-vs-slavs-education-level.webp)
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Slavic |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.8% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.2% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 92.8% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 91.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 87.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Excellent 66.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Excellent 60.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Excellent 47.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Good 38.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Good 15.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Good 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Good 1.9% |
Chickasaw vs Slavic Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 46.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 38.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 11.0%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 11.0%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.0%).
![Chickasaw vs Slavic Disability](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-slavs/chickasaw-vs-slavs-disability.webp)
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Slavic |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.4% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 12.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Poor 11.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Good 23.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 46.1% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Average 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.4% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Fair 2.5% |