Chickasaw vs Japanese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Japanese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Japanese
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,662
SOCIAL INDEX
24.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
248th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Japanese Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,486,010 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.302. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.142% in Japanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 142.3 Japanese.
![Chickasaw Integration in Japanese Communities](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-japanese/chickasaw-vs-japanese-community-integration.webp)
Chickasaw vs Japanese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $83,395, a difference of 19.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $96,834, a difference of 17.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $91,624, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $51,473, a difference of 7.6%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $57,919, a difference of 7.8%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $39,870, a difference of 9.3%).
![Chickasaw vs Japanese Income](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-japanese/chickasaw-vs-japanese-income.webp)
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Japanese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $39,870 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $97,288 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Fair $83,395 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $44,825 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $51,473 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $38,528 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Good $52,365 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Poor $91,624 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Poor $96,834 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $57,919 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 23.8% |
Chickasaw vs Japanese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 30.1%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 24.6%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.2%), receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 9.7%).
![Chickasaw vs Japanese Poverty](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-japanese/chickasaw-vs-japanese-poverty.webp)
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Japanese |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 13.3% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 9.9% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 14.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 18.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Poor 14.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Poor 18.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 17.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 17.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 17.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Fair 21.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Good 28.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 12.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 14.1% |
Chickasaw vs Japanese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 19.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.45%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
![Chickasaw vs Japanese Unemployment](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-japanese/chickasaw-vs-japanese-unemployment.webp)
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Japanese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Fair 11.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Average 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Good 7.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Chickasaw vs Japanese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.9%).
![Chickasaw vs Japanese Labor Participation](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-japanese/chickasaw-vs-japanese-labor-force.webp)
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Japanese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 65.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Excellent 37.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Good 75.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 83.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 81.6% |
Chickasaw vs Japanese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 18.7%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.35, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.020%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (64.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.3%).
![Chickasaw vs Japanese Family Structure](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-japanese/chickasaw-vs-japanese-family-structure.webp)
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Japanese |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 29.4% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 45.2% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.35 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 44.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 35.2% |
Chickasaw vs Japanese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 20.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 1.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 2.6%).
![Chickasaw vs Japanese Vehicle Availability](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-japanese/chickasaw-vs-japanese-vehicle-availability.webp)
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Japanese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 90.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 57.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 21.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Chickasaw vs Japanese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 97.5%), bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 9.6%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.61%), college, under 1 year (60.4% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
![Chickasaw vs Japanese Education Level](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-japanese/chickasaw-vs-japanese-education-level.webp)
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Japanese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 3.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 95.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 95.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 93.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 92.6% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 91.2% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 89.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 88.3% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 85.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 82.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 61.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 55.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 41.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 33.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 12.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Chickasaw vs Japanese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 48.9%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 47.8%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.6%).
![Chickasaw vs Japanese Disability](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-japanese/chickasaw-vs-japanese-disability.webp)
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Japanese |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 11.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 25.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 50.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Average 3.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 18.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Poor 6.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.7% |