Chickasaw vs Burmese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Burmese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Burmese
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Burmese Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,298,229 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.165. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 15.2 Burmese.
![Chickasaw Integration in Burmese Communities](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-burmese/chickasaw-vs-burmese-community-integration.webp)
Chickasaw vs Burmese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $121,444, a difference of 47.8%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $103,145, a difference of 47.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $113,701, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.1%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $54,800, a difference of 22.4%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $44,911, a difference of 30.5%).
![Chickasaw vs Burmese Income](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-burmese/chickasaw-vs-burmese-income.webp)
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Burmese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $52,005 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $123,369 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $103,145 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $54,559 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $65,236 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $44,911 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $54,800 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $113,701 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $121,444 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $71,139 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 28.0% |
Chickasaw vs Burmese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 65.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 52.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.35%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 22.6%).
![Chickasaw vs Burmese Poverty](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-burmese/chickasaw-vs-burmese-poverty.webp)
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Burmese |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 18.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 13.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 13.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 13.0% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 18.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 15.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 26.2% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Chickasaw vs Burmese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 38.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.8%).
![Chickasaw vs Burmese Unemployment](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-burmese/chickasaw-vs-burmese-unemployment.webp)
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Burmese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Excellent 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Excellent 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Chickasaw vs Burmese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 4.1%).
![Chickasaw vs Burmese Labor Participation](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-burmese/chickasaw-vs-burmese-labor-force.webp)
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Burmese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 66.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 34.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 73.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.6% |
Chickasaw vs Burmese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 37.7%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.3%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.90%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.98%), and family households (64.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.1%).
![Chickasaw vs Burmese Family Structure](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-burmese/chickasaw-vs-burmese-family-structure.webp)
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Burmese |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 65.7% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 49.8% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Fair 3.22 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 48.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 26.4% |
Chickasaw vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 23.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 7.5%).
![Chickasaw vs Burmese Vehicle Availability](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-burmese/chickasaw-vs-burmese-vehicle-availability.webp)
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Burmese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Excellent 9.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Excellent 90.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 57.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 20.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Chickasaw vs Burmese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 82.8%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 74.6%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 72.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.31%).
![Chickasaw vs Burmese Education Level](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-burmese/chickasaw-vs-burmese-education-level.webp)
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Burmese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Excellent 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Excellent 98.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Excellent 98.1% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Excellent 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Excellent 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Good 97.9% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Excellent 97.5% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Excellent 97.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Excellent 96.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 94.5% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 93.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 90.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 88.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 71.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 66.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 54.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 46.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 19.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Chickasaw vs Burmese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 74.9%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 71.9%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 59.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 11.0%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 11.5%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 26.5%).
![Chickasaw vs Burmese Disability](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-burmese/chickasaw-vs-burmese-disability.webp)
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Burmese |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 20.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 45.9% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |