Chickasaw vs Bhutanese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Bhutanese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Bhutanese
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Bhutanese Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,277,272 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.070. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 8.7 Bhutanese.
![Chickasaw Integration in Bhutanese Communities](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-bhutanese/chickasaw-vs-bhutanese-community-integration.webp)
Chickasaw vs Bhutanese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $117,750, a difference of 43.3%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $100,151, a difference of 43.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $109,520, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.67%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $43,648, a difference of 26.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $57,078, a difference of 27.5%).
![Chickasaw vs Bhutanese Income](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-bhutanese/chickasaw-vs-bhutanese-income.webp)
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Bhutanese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $49,894 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $119,800 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $100,151 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $52,297 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $61,759 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $43,648 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $57,078 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $109,520 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $117,750 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $72,288 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 27.0% |
Chickasaw vs Bhutanese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 63.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 57.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 55.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 10.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 14.3%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 26.6%).
![Chickasaw vs Bhutanese Poverty](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-bhutanese/chickasaw-vs-bhutanese-poverty.webp)
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Bhutanese |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 18.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 25.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 9.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Chickasaw vs Bhutanese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 33.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.62%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.6%).
![Chickasaw vs Bhutanese Unemployment](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-bhutanese/chickasaw-vs-bhutanese-unemployment.webp)
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Bhutanese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Chickasaw vs Bhutanese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.7%).
![Chickasaw vs Bhutanese Labor Participation](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-bhutanese/chickasaw-vs-bhutanese-labor-force.webp)
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Bhutanese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Fair 36.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Excellent 75.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Excellent 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.5% |
Chickasaw vs Bhutanese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 33.5%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 30.2%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.9%), family households (64.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 3.4%).
![Chickasaw vs Bhutanese Family Structure](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-bhutanese/chickasaw-vs-bhutanese-family-structure.webp)
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Bhutanese |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Fair 27.3% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 49.3% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 48.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Chickasaw vs Bhutanese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 10.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.98%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 0.14%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.98%).
![Chickasaw vs Bhutanese Vehicle Availability](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-bhutanese/chickasaw-vs-bhutanese-vehicle-availability.webp)
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Bhutanese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 59.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Chickasaw vs Bhutanese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 61.8%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 53.8%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and 4th grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.14%).
![Chickasaw vs Bhutanese Education Level](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-bhutanese/chickasaw-vs-bhutanese-education-level.webp)
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Bhutanese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 93.0% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 91.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 88.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 70.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 64.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 51.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 42.7% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 17.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Chickasaw vs Bhutanese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 63.7%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 62.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 8.7%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 11.7%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.0%).
![Chickasaw vs Bhutanese Disability](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-bhutanese/chickasaw-vs-bhutanese-disability.webp)
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Bhutanese |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Excellent 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Good 47.1% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.4% |