Chickasaw vs American Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
American
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Americans
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,435
SOCIAL INDEX
31.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
220th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
American Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,682,212 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Americans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.105% in Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 104.6 Americans.
![Chickasaw Integration in American Communities](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-americans/chickasaw-vs-americans-community-integration.webp)
Chickasaw vs American Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and American communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $90,536, a difference of 10.2%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $48,860, a difference of 9.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $84,791, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.5%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $55,527, a difference of 3.3%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $35,777, a difference of 4.0%).
![Chickasaw vs American Income](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-americans/chickasaw-vs-americans-income.webp)
Income Metric | Chickasaw | American |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $39,039 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $92,096 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $75,932 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $42,742 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $50,761 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $35,777 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $48,860 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $84,791 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $90,536 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $55,527 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 27.8% |
Chickasaw vs American Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and American communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 13.6%), male poverty (13.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 11.3%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.56%), single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.8%).
![Chickasaw vs American Poverty](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-americans/chickasaw-vs-americans-poverty.webp)
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | American |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 13.4% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 9.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 21.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 16.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 20.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 18.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 18.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 15.8% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 24.5% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 20.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 33.5% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Fair 5.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Good 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Fair 12.2% |
Chickasaw vs American Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 41.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 21.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.11%).
![Chickasaw vs American Unemployment](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-americans/chickasaw-vs-americans-unemployment.webp)
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | American |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Fair 11.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Fair 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 10.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 10.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Chickasaw vs American Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
![Chickasaw vs American Labor Participation](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-americans/chickasaw-vs-americans-labor-force.webp)
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | American |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 62.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 77.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 40.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 82.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 82.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 80.4% |
Chickasaw vs American Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and American communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.0%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.3%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 0.31%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.86%), and family households (64.4% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
![Chickasaw vs American Family Structure](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-americans/chickasaw-vs-americans-family-structure.webp)
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | American |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 65.5% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Fair 27.3% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Poor 6.6% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 48.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 36.4% |
Chickasaw vs American Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and American communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.24%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 1.8%).
![Chickasaw vs American Vehicle Availability](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-americans/chickasaw-vs-americans-vehicle-availability.webp)
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | American |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 92.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 60.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 22.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.5% |
Chickasaw vs American Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and American communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 7.7%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and associate's degree (38.6% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.040%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.040%).
![Chickasaw vs American Education Level](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-americans/chickasaw-vs-americans-education-level.webp)
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | American |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.6% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Good 92.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Fair 91.0% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Average 89.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 84.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 61.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 54.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 40.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 31.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 12.3% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Chickasaw vs American Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and American communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 17.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 3.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 5.7%).
![Chickasaw vs American Disability](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-americans/chickasaw-vs-americans-disability.webp)
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | American |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.9% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 14.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 13.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 25.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Good 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.8% |