Cherokee vs Luxembourger Community Comparison
COMPARE
Cherokee
Luxembourger
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Cherokee
Luxembourgers
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Luxembourger Integration in Cherokee Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,152,858 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.648. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.111% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 111.0 Luxembourgers.
![Cherokee Integration in Luxembourger Communities](/correlation-charts/comparison/cherokee-vs-luxembourgers/cherokee-vs-luxembourgers-community-integration.webp)
Cherokee vs Luxembourger Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,203 compared to $45,663, a difference of 22.7%), median family income ($88,209 compared to $106,183, a difference of 20.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $97,237, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.050%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $50,379, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $60,967, a difference of 12.6%).
![Cherokee vs Luxembourger Income](/correlation-charts/comparison/cherokee-vs-luxembourgers/cherokee-vs-luxembourgers-income.webp)
Income Metric | Cherokee | Luxembourger |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,203 | Exceptional $45,663 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,209 | Excellent $106,183 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $72,682 | Good $86,418 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,252 | Excellent $47,640 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,669 | Excellent $56,300 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,742 | Average $39,891 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,848 | Tragic $50,379 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,843 | Excellent $97,237 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $86,125 | Excellent $103,536 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,133 | Average $60,967 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.4% | Tragic 27.4% |
Cherokee vs Luxembourger Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 48.6%), family poverty (10.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 46.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 8.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 11.4%), and single father poverty (19.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 14.8%).
![Cherokee vs Luxembourger Poverty](/correlation-charts/comparison/cherokee-vs-luxembourgers/cherokee-vs-luxembourgers-poverty.webp)
Poverty Metric | Cherokee | Luxembourger |
Poverty | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Families | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 20.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.2% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.7% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.7% | Exceptional 13.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 13.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Excellent 20.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 17.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.5% | Excellent 28.5% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 11.0% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Cherokee vs Luxembourger Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 40.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 32.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 9.7%).
![Cherokee vs Luxembourger Unemployment](/correlation-charts/comparison/cherokee-vs-luxembourgers/cherokee-vs-luxembourgers-unemployment.webp)
Unemployment Metric | Cherokee | Luxembourger |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Females | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Youth < 25 | Fair 11.8% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 17.9% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.5% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.6% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Poor 4.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Cherokee vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 6.1%).
![Cherokee vs Luxembourger Labor Participation](/correlation-charts/comparison/cherokee-vs-luxembourgers/cherokee-vs-luxembourgers-labor-force.webp)
Labor Participation Metric | Cherokee | Luxembourger |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.9% | Exceptional 66.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.2% | Exceptional 45.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.9% | Exceptional 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.1% | Exceptional 86.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.6% | Exceptional 86.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.4% | Exceptional 86.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 85.0% |
Cherokee vs Luxembourger Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 24.6%), single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 22.6%), and divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.10, a difference of 2.6%), and family households (65.0% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 2.6%).
![Cherokee vs Luxembourger Family Structure](/correlation-charts/comparison/cherokee-vs-luxembourgers/cherokee-vs-luxembourgers-family-structure.webp)
Family Structure Metric | Cherokee | Luxembourger |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Tragic 63.3% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.5% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.7% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Tragic 3.10 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Good 46.9% | Exceptional 49.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.7% | Exceptional 29.4% |
Cherokee vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 44.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 1.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 10.1%).
![Cherokee vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability](/correlation-charts/comparison/cherokee-vs-luxembourgers/cherokee-vs-luxembourgers-vehicle-availability.webp)
Vehicle Availability Metric | Cherokee | Luxembourger |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 5.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.4% | Exceptional 94.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.9% | Exceptional 59.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.0% | Exceptional 20.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Excellent 6.6% |
Cherokee vs Luxembourger Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 40.2%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 35.0%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.17%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.17%).
![Cherokee vs Luxembourger Education Level](/correlation-charts/comparison/cherokee-vs-luxembourgers/cherokee-vs-luxembourgers-education-level.webp)
Education Level Metric | Cherokee | Luxembourger |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 97.2% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.4% |
11th Grade | Average 92.4% | Exceptional 94.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Exceptional 93.3% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.5% | Exceptional 91.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.9% | Exceptional 88.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.1% | Exceptional 68.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.2% | Exceptional 62.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.9% | Exceptional 48.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Excellent 39.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Good 15.3% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Good 4.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Excellent 1.9% |
Cherokee vs Luxembourger Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 50.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 46.1%), and ambulatory disability (7.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 9.8%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 12.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 27.0%).
![Cherokee vs Luxembourger Disability](/correlation-charts/comparison/cherokee-vs-luxembourgers/cherokee-vs-luxembourgers-disability.webp)
Disability Metric | Cherokee | Luxembourger |
Disability | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Males | Tragic 14.8% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 14.9% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.8% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.5% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 21.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.2% | Exceptional 44.8% |
Vision | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.2% |