Central American Indian vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Central American Indian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Central American Indians

Ecuadorians

Tragic
Poor
506
SOCIAL INDEX
2.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
344th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ecuadorian Integration in Central American Indian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 245,357,176 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Central American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.477. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.198% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central American Indians corresponds to an increase of 198.1 Ecuadorians.
Central American Indian Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

Central American Indian vs Ecuadorian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,699 compared to $41,958, a difference of 11.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,355 compared to $91,574, a difference of 11.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($48,643 compared to $53,911, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 1.0%), householder income over 65 years ($53,232 compared to $54,958, a difference of 3.2%), and median family income ($88,034 compared to $95,114, a difference of 8.0%).
Central American Indian vs Ecuadorian Income
Income MetricCentral American IndianEcuadorian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,699
Poor
$41,958
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,034
Tragic
$95,114
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,847
Poor
$82,070
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,474
Poor
$45,214
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,433
Tragic
$51,596
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,930
Fair
$39,117
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,643
Exceptional
$53,911
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,355
Poor
$91,574
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,764
Tragic
$93,739
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,232
Tragic
$54,958
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.7%
Exceptional
22.9%

Central American Indian vs Ecuadorian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (17.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 38.1%), single father poverty (21.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 31.4%), and married-couple family poverty (8.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 5.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 7.8%), and single mother poverty (34.3% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 11.5%).
Central American Indian vs Ecuadorian Poverty
Poverty MetricCentral American IndianEcuadorian
Poverty
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.6%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.9%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
19.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
22.8%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Males
Tragic
17.2%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
25.5%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
21.7%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.3%
Tragic
30.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
15.1%
Tragic
14.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.5%
Tragic
15.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
17.1%
Tragic
14.9%

Central American Indian vs Ecuadorian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 21.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and female unemployment (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.41%).
Central American Indian vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCentral American IndianEcuadorian
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
20.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.6%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
6.5%

Central American Indian vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.1% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
Central American Indian vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCentral American IndianEcuadorian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.4%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.1%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.1%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.7%
Tragic
72.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.4%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.0%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.5%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.0%
Tragic
82.3%

Central American Indian vs Ecuadorian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.0% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 17.1%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.7%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.34%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.47%), and married-couple households (43.8% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 0.65%).
Central American Indian vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCentral American IndianEcuadorian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.8%
Tragic
43.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.35
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.6%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.3%
Tragic
43.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
39.0%
Poor
33.3%

Central American Indian vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 70.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 44.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 11.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 25.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 35.5%).
Central American Indian vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCentral American IndianEcuadorian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
22.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.7%
Tragic
77.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.5%
Tragic
42.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.0%
Tragic
14.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Tragic
4.5%

Central American Indian vs Ecuadorian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 12.5%), bachelor's degree (32.5% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 8.7%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.030%), 2nd grade (97.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.12%).
Central American Indian vs Ecuadorian Education Level
Education Level MetricCentral American IndianEcuadorian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.2%
Tragic
97.1%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.2%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Tragic
97.0%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
96.9%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
96.7%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Tragic
96.4%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Tragic
95.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.3%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
92.7%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.5%
Tragic
91.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
89.7%
Tragic
90.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.2%
Tragic
89.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
86.5%
Tragic
88.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
85.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.6%
Tragic
81.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.0%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.5%
Tragic
54.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.8%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
32.5%
Tragic
35.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.4%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%

Central American Indian vs Ecuadorian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 34.2%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 29.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 5.6%), disability age over 75 (50.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 6.6%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.3%).
Central American Indian vs Ecuadorian Disability
Disability MetricCentral American IndianEcuadorian
Disability
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.1%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.5%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Average
17.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.2%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.6%