Cajun vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Cajun
Zimbabwean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Cajuns
Zimbabweans
2,029
SOCIAL INDEX
17.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
275th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Zimbabwean Integration in Cajun Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,142,818 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Cajun communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.691. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cajuns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.041% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cajuns corresponds to an increase of 41.0 Zimbabweans.
Cajun vs Zimbabwean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Cajun and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (33.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 28.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,015 compared to $106,849, a difference of 28.7%), and median household income ($70,605 compared to $90,618, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($52,325 compared to $56,302, a difference of 7.6%), householder income under 25 years ($45,338 compared to $51,259, a difference of 13.1%), and median earnings ($42,189 compared to $48,229, a difference of 14.3%).
Income Metric | Cajun | Zimbabwean |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,527 | Exceptional $45,804 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $87,157 | Exceptional $110,011 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,605 | Exceptional $90,618 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,189 | Exceptional $48,229 |
Median Male Earnings | Poor $52,325 | Excellent $56,302 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,034 | Exceptional $40,798 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,338 | Tragic $51,259 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,393 | Exceptional $98,586 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,015 | Exceptional $106,849 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $51,397 | Exceptional $65,854 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 33.9% | Fair 26.3% |
Cajun vs Zimbabwean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cajun and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 71.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (24.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 58.8%), and single female poverty (30.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 57.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 23.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 25.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 25.8%).
Poverty Metric | Cajun | Zimbabwean |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.9% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Tragic 17.5% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.7% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 24.1% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 22.1% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 22.2% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 22.6% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 19.1% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.6% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 40.3% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Cajun vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cajun and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (12.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 43.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 37.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 10.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Cajun | Zimbabwean |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.0% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 12.5% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Cajun vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cajun and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.8% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.5% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 2.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Cajun | Zimbabwean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.8% | Exceptional 67.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.5% | Exceptional 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.8% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.1% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.5% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.0% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.5% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.1% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Cajun vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cajun and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.0% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 42.8%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 21.0%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.1% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.24%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.61%), and average family size (3.17 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.82%).
Family Structure Metric | Cajun | Zimbabwean |
Family Households | Excellent 64.8% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Excellent 27.7% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.4% | Excellent 47.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.17 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.3% | Excellent 6.1% |
Currently Married | Good 47.1% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 41.0% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Cajun vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cajun and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 8.1%), no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.7% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 0.72%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.74%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 5.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Cajun | Zimbabwean |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.7% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.7% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Excellent 20.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 6.0% | Good 6.4% |
Cajun vs Zimbabwean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cajun and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 61.6%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 56.6%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 54.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%).
Education Level Metric | Cajun | Zimbabwean |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Good 95.1% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.4% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.4% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.1% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.3% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.4% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 57.3% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 64.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.4% | Exceptional 51.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 29.6% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.0% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Cajun vs Zimbabwean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cajun and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 55.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 46.8%), and ambulatory disability (7.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age over 75 (50.7% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 26.2%).
Disability Metric | Cajun | Zimbabwean |
Disability | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 14.9% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.2% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.2% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.3% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.9% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.7% | Tragic 48.1% |
Vision | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.9% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.2% |