Burmese vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Burmese
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Burmese
Iroquois
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Burmese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,723,607 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.459. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 8.0 Iroquois.
![Burmese Integration in Iroquois Communities](/correlation-charts/comparison/burmese-vs-iroquois/burmese-vs-iroquois-community-integration.webp)
Burmese vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $87,255, a difference of 39.2%), median household income ($103,145 compared to $74,279, a difference of 38.9%), and median family income ($123,369 compared to $90,543, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 11.7%), householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $47,380, a difference of 15.7%), and median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $36,408, a difference of 23.4%).
![Burmese vs Iroquois Income](/correlation-charts/comparison/burmese-vs-iroquois/burmese-vs-iroquois-income.webp)
Income Metric | Burmese | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,005 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $123,369 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $103,145 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $54,559 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $65,236 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $44,911 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,800 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $113,701 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $121,444 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $71,139 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.0% | Excellent 25.1% |
Burmese vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 66.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 57.0%), and receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 56.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 14.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 18.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 20.0%).
![Burmese vs Iroquois Poverty](/correlation-charts/comparison/burmese-vs-iroquois/burmese-vs-iroquois-poverty.webp)
Poverty Metric | Burmese | Iroquois |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.9% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.2% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.0% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.0% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.3% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.5% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.2% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 13.5% |
Burmese vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 34.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 21.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.58%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.4%).
![Burmese vs Iroquois Unemployment](/correlation-charts/comparison/burmese-vs-iroquois/burmese-vs-iroquois-unemployment.webp)
Unemployment Metric | Burmese | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.3% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.0% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.0% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.7% |
Burmese vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.8%).
![Burmese vs Iroquois Labor Participation](/correlation-charts/comparison/burmese-vs-iroquois/burmese-vs-iroquois-labor-force.webp)
Labor Participation Metric | Burmese | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.2% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.3% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.5% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.6% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.3% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.6% | Tragic 80.6% |
Burmese vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 44.9%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 31.7%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.8%), family households (65.7% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 9.4%).
![Burmese vs Iroquois Family Structure](/correlation-charts/comparison/burmese-vs-iroquois/burmese-vs-iroquois-family-structure.webp)
Family Structure Metric | Burmese | Iroquois |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.7% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.8% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.22 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.9% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 26.4% | Tragic 38.2% |
Burmese vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 13.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 5.7%).
![Burmese vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability](/correlation-charts/comparison/burmese-vs-iroquois/burmese-vs-iroquois-vehicle-availability.webp)
Vehicle Availability Metric | Burmese | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.7% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.4% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.8% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.6% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Good 6.5% |
Burmese vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 66.2%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 65.0%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 52.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.090%).
![Burmese vs Iroquois Education Level](/correlation-charts/comparison/burmese-vs-iroquois/burmese-vs-iroquois-education-level.webp)
Education Level Metric | Burmese | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Excellent 1.9% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Excellent 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Excellent 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Excellent 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Excellent 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Good 97.9% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Excellent 97.5% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.3% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Excellent 96.3% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.5% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.6% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.8% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.3% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.9% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.7% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 54.6% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 46.9% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.7% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 1.6% |
Burmese vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 55.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 44.1%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 5.5%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 19.0%).
![Burmese vs Iroquois Disability](/correlation-charts/comparison/burmese-vs-iroquois/burmese-vs-iroquois-disability.webp)
Disability Metric | Burmese | Iroquois |
Disability | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.6% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.9% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.7% |