British West Indian vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,974,781 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese within British West Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.026. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in British West Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 British West Indians corresponds to a decrease of 5.6 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($51,463 compared to $77,465, a difference of 50.5%), wage/income gap (18.0% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 43.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,571 compared to $116,156, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,299 compared to $41,461, a difference of 2.9%), median earnings ($44,552 compared to $48,836, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,844 compared to $58,162, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 95.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 92.0%), and family poverty (12.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 90.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 14.7%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 21.7%), and single mother poverty (31.5% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 27.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (24.0% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 49.4%), male unemployment (7.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 48.5%), and unemployment (6.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 4.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 22.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 32.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 10.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 62.4%), married-couple households (38.3% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 31.4%), and births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 0.080%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.61%), and family households (62.8% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 261.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 156.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 108.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 30.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.4% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 69.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 108.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 85.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 21.1%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 51.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.5%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.070%), disability (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.0%).