Brazilian vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Brazilian
Zimbabwean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Brazilians
Zimbabweans
6,919
SOCIAL INDEX
66.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
136th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Zimbabwean Integration in Brazilian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,108,259 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.449. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to an increase of 10.4 Zimbabweans.
Brazilian vs Zimbabwean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,465 compared to $65,854, a difference of 7.1%), householder income under 25 years ($54,335 compared to $51,259, a difference of 6.0%), and median family income ($106,942 compared to $110,011, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($48,356 compared to $48,229, a difference of 0.26%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,267 compared to $98,586, a difference of 0.32%), and median female earnings ($40,483 compared to $40,798, a difference of 0.78%).
Income Metric | Brazilian | Zimbabwean |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,700 | Exceptional $45,804 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,942 | Exceptional $110,011 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $88,934 | Exceptional $90,618 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,356 | Exceptional $48,229 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,837 | Excellent $56,302 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,483 | Exceptional $40,798 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,335 | Tragic $51,259 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $98,267 | Exceptional $98,586 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $104,408 | Exceptional $106,849 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,465 | Exceptional $65,854 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 26.7% | Fair 26.3% |
Brazilian vs Zimbabwean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 23.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 18.1%), and receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.80%), single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and single female poverty (20.1% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 2.9%).
Poverty Metric | Brazilian | Zimbabwean |
Poverty | Good 11.9% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Excellent 8.6% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Excellent 10.8% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Excellent 13.0% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.6% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Excellent 13.1% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.4% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.4% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.8% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.4% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.8% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.1% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.5% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.3% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Good 5.0% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.3% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.1% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Brazilian vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.2%), female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 4.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Brazilian | Zimbabwean |
Unemployment | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.1% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Fair 4.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 5.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.7% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.1% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Brazilian vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.37%).
Labor Participation Metric | Brazilian | Zimbabwean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.6% | Exceptional 67.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Exceptional 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.5% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.8% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.3% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.7% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Brazilian vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 5.9%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.28%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.52%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.79%).
Family Structure Metric | Brazilian | Zimbabwean |
Family Households | Poor 63.9% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.7% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.2% | Excellent 47.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.2% | Excellent 6.1% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.4% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Average 12.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.4% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Brazilian vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 16.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 14.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Brazilian | Zimbabwean |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.4% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.0% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.8% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.4% | Excellent 20.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.4% | Good 6.4% |
Brazilian vs Zimbabwean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 19.3%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.4%), and master's degree (16.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.30%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.33%).
Education Level Metric | Brazilian | Zimbabwean |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.1% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.2% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Fair 96.9% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Fair 96.0% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Average 94.9% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Good 93.8% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.3% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 65.9% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Good 60.5% | Exceptional 64.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.7% | Exceptional 51.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.8% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.5% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Brazilian vs Zimbabwean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 23.8%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.42%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.2%).
Disability Metric | Brazilian | Zimbabwean |
Disability | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Excellent 10.9% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.4% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Tragic 48.1% |
Vision | Good 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Good 2.9% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Good 17.1% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.2% |