Brazilian vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Brazilian
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Brazilians
Tsimshian
6,919
SOCIAL INDEX
66.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
136th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in Brazilian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 13,879,314 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.107. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to a decrease of 6.9 Tsimshian.
Brazilian vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($56,837 compared to $48,836, a difference of 16.4%), per capita income ($46,700 compared to $40,344, a difference of 15.8%), and wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,267 compared to $97,809, a difference of 0.47%), householder income under 25 years ($54,335 compared to $54,649, a difference of 0.58%), and median female earnings ($40,483 compared to $39,530, a difference of 2.4%).
Income Metric | Brazilian | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,700 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,942 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $88,934 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,356 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,837 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,483 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,335 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $98,267 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $104,408 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,465 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 26.7% | Exceptional 23.9% |
Brazilian vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 42.0%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 34.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (13.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.74%), family poverty (8.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.8%).
Poverty Metric | Brazilian | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Good 11.9% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Excellent 8.6% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Excellent 10.8% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Excellent 13.0% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.6% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Excellent 13.1% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.4% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.4% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.8% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.4% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.8% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.1% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.5% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.3% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Good 5.0% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.3% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.1% | Tragic 15.7% |
Brazilian vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 153.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 76.5%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 63.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.6%), female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Brazilian | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Average 5.3% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Tragic 5.5% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.1% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Fair 4.6% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.7% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.1% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.8% | Poor 5.6% |
Brazilian vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Brazilian | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.6% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.5% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.8% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.3% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.7% | Tragic 77.4% |
Brazilian vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 38.7%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 29.7%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.1%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and currently married (46.4% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 2.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Brazilian | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Poor 63.9% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.7% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.2% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.2% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.4% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Average 12.1% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.4% | Tragic 42.2% |
Brazilian vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 20.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 9.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Brazilian | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.4% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.0% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.8% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.4% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.4% | Fair 6.2% |
Brazilian vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 56.9%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 47.8%), and master's degree (16.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.3% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 0.41%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.87%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.90%).
Education Level Metric | Brazilian | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.1% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Fair 96.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Fair 96.0% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Average 94.9% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Good 93.8% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.3% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 65.9% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Good 60.5% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.7% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.8% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.5% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 1.4% |
Brazilian vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 65.4%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 62.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 59.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.96%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 16.2%).
Disability Metric | Brazilian | Tsimshian |
Disability | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Excellent 10.9% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.4% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Good 2.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Good 2.9% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Good 17.1% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |