Brazilian vs Mongolian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Brazilian
Mongolian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Brazilians
Mongolians
6,919
SOCIAL INDEX
66.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
136th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,008
SOCIAL INDEX
77.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
93rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Mongolian Integration in Brazilian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,536,949 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.097. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to a decrease of 1.0 Mongolians.
Brazilian vs Mongolian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($106,942 compared to $114,553, a difference of 7.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,408 compared to $111,602, a difference of 6.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,267 compared to $104,578, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 0.38%), householder income under 25 years ($54,335 compared to $52,540, a difference of 3.4%), and median female earnings ($40,483 compared to $42,542, a difference of 5.1%).
Income Metric | Brazilian | Mongolian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,700 | Exceptional $49,173 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,942 | Exceptional $114,553 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $88,934 | Exceptional $93,971 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,356 | Exceptional $51,038 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,837 | Exceptional $60,350 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,483 | Exceptional $42,542 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,335 | Good $52,540 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $98,267 | Exceptional $104,578 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $104,408 | Exceptional $111,602 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,465 | Exceptional $65,326 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 26.7% | Poor 26.6% |
Brazilian vs Mongolian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 16.0%), receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and male poverty (10.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.020%), family poverty (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.27%).
Poverty Metric | Brazilian | Mongolian |
Poverty | Good 11.9% | Average 12.4% |
Families | Excellent 8.6% | Excellent 8.6% |
Males | Excellent 10.8% | Fair 11.3% |
Females | Excellent 13.0% | Average 13.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.6% | Tragic 21.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Excellent 13.1% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.4% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.4% | Excellent 15.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.8% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.4% | Excellent 15.4% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.8% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.1% | Exceptional 20.2% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.5% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.3% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Married Couples | Good 5.0% | Good 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.3% | Average 10.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.8% | Average 12.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.1% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Brazilian vs Mongolian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.4%), and female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.72%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Brazilian | Mongolian |
Unemployment | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Females | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.1% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Fair 4.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 5.0% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.5% | Average 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Excellent 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.7% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.1% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Brazilian vs Mongolian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.85%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.23%).
Labor Participation Metric | Brazilian | Mongolian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.6% | Exceptional 66.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Exceptional 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.5% | Tragic 35.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.8% | Tragic 73.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.3% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Exceptional 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.7% | Exceptional 83.3% |
Brazilian vs Mongolian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 9.0%), births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 8.9%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.4% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 0.070%), married-couple households (46.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.26%).
Family Structure Metric | Brazilian | Mongolian |
Family Households | Poor 63.9% | Tragic 62.8% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.7% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.2% | Average 46.3% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.2% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.4% | Fair 46.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Average 12.1% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.4% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Brazilian vs Mongolian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 26.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 1.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Brazilian | Mongolian |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.4% | Tragic 13.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.0% | Tragic 87.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.8% | Tragic 52.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.4% | Tragic 18.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Brazilian vs Mongolian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 32.9%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 23.0%), and master's degree (16.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.060%), 4th grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and 5th grade (97.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.070%).
Education Level Metric | Brazilian | Mongolian |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.1% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Fair 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Average 97.9% | Fair 97.9% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Fair 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Fair 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Fair 97.7% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Fair 97.5% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.2% | Fair 97.3% |
6th Grade | Fair 96.9% | Average 97.0% |
7th Grade | Fair 96.0% | Average 96.0% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Average 95.8% |
9th Grade | Average 94.9% | Good 95.0% |
10th Grade | Good 93.8% | Good 94.0% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Excellent 93.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Excellent 91.8% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Exceptional 89.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.3% | Exceptional 87.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 65.9% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Good 60.5% | Exceptional 64.8% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.7% | Exceptional 53.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.8% | Exceptional 45.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.5% | Exceptional 19.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Brazilian vs Mongolian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 27.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.5%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
Disability Metric | Brazilian | Mongolian |
Disability | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Males | Excellent 10.9% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.4% | Exceptional 21.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Exceptional 46.3% |
Vision | Good 2.1% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Hearing | Good 2.9% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Good 17.1% | Tragic 17.7% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.3% |