Blackfeet vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Blackfeet
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Blackfeet

Luxembourgers

Poor
Excellent
1,951
SOCIAL INDEX
17.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
279th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Blackfeet Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,648,591 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Blackfeet communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.234. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Blackfeet within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Blackfeet corresponds to an increase of 16.5 Luxembourgers.
Blackfeet Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Blackfeet vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,695 compared to $45,663, a difference of 21.1%), median family income ($88,717 compared to $106,183, a difference of 19.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,595 compared to $103,536, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,603 compared to $50,379, a difference of 3.6%), wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 8.7%), and median female earnings ($35,864 compared to $39,891, a difference of 11.2%).
Blackfeet vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricBlackfeetLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,695
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,717
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Tragic
$73,509
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,822
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,402
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,864
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,603
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$81,531
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,595
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,029
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.2%
Tragic
27.4%

Blackfeet vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 59.0%), receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 56.4%), and family poverty (11.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 55.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 8.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 13.2%), and single male poverty (15.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 16.1%).
Blackfeet vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricBlackfeetLuxembourger
Poverty
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Tragic
11.3%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
23.6%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Tragic
15.5%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
25.1%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
33.2%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
9.1%

Blackfeet vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 34.7%), female unemployment (5.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 33.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 13.2%).
Blackfeet vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBlackfeetLuxembourger
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.0%

Blackfeet vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 16.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.8% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.6% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 5.2%).
Blackfeet vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBlackfeetLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.2%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.0%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.9%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.6%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.8%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.0%
Exceptional
85.0%

Blackfeet vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 34.6%), births to unmarried women (37.9% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 28.8%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.48%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.10, a difference of 4.6%).
Blackfeet vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBlackfeetLuxembourger
Family Households
Tragic
63.6%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.8%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.2%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.9%
Exceptional
29.4%

Blackfeet vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 78.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 0.15%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 4.8%).
Blackfeet vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBlackfeetLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.6%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.4%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Excellent
6.6%

Blackfeet vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 32.9%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 28.8%), and no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.39%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.40%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.40%).
Blackfeet vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricBlackfeetLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.0%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Average
93.7%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Poor
92.0%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.1%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.1%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.6%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.3%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.5%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.1%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Excellent
1.9%

Blackfeet vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 35.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 32.9%), and ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 8.8%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 11.5%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 11.7%).
Blackfeet vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricBlackfeetLuxembourger
Disability
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
13.4%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.6%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.8%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.2%