Bhutanese vs Pima Community Comparison
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Pima
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Bhutanese
Pima
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Pima Integration in Bhutanese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,413,536 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.527. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to an increase of 2.5 Pima.
Bhutanese vs Pima Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,894 compared to $30,644, a difference of 62.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $73,365, a difference of 60.5%), and median household income ($100,151 compared to $63,262, a difference of 58.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $51,503, a difference of 10.8%), median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $35,326, a difference of 23.6%), and wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 27.8%).
Income Metric | Bhutanese | Pima |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $49,894 | Tragic $30,644 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $119,800 | Tragic $77,431 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $100,151 | Tragic $63,262 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $52,297 | Tragic $38,285 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,759 | Tragic $42,357 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,648 | Tragic $35,326 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,078 | Poor $51,503 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $109,520 | Tragic $82,821 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $117,750 | Tragic $73,365 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $72,288 | Tragic $50,539 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.0% | Exceptional 21.1% |
Bhutanese vs Pima Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 178.5%), family poverty (7.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 160.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (12.6% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 136.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 1.4%), single mother poverty (25.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 50.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 56.1%).
Poverty Metric | Bhutanese | Pima |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 21.9% |
Families | Exceptional 7.0% | Tragic 18.4% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 20.4% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 23.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.2% | Tragic 28.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 25.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Tragic 27.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 29.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.6% | Tragic 29.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 28.2% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 20.2% |
Single Females | Exceptional 17.7% | Tragic 30.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.0% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 25.6% | Tragic 38.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 11.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.3% | Tragic 19.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 23.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 19.0% |
Bhutanese vs Pima Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 169.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 134.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 134.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 14.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 29.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Bhutanese | Pima |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 8.2% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 8.3% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 9.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 16.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.4% | Tragic 23.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 9.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.0% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 13.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 18.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 11.7% |
Bhutanese vs Pima Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 16.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 14.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 9.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Bhutanese | Pima |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Tragic 57.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.2% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Fair 36.3% | Tragic 34.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.4% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 74.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.7% | Tragic 74.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.5% | Tragic 72.8% |
Bhutanese vs Pima Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 97.6%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 84.7%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 56.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.13%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.67%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 15.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Bhutanese | Pima |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.3% | Tragic 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.3% | Tragic 35.6% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Exceptional 3.75 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 4.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 8.3% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.6% | Tragic 35.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 51.5% |
Bhutanese vs Pima Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 62.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 13.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.86%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 0.96%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 5.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Bhutanese | Pima |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 14.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Tragic 86.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.1% | Tragic 52.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 22.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Bhutanese vs Pima Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 85.9%), bachelor's degree (42.7% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 83.9%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 76.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.0%), 2nd grade (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.0%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%).
Education Level Metric | Bhutanese | Pima |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Excellent 97.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Good 96.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Tragic 91.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Tragic 88.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.0% | Tragic 84.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.2% | Tragic 81.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.4% | Tragic 76.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.3% | Tragic 51.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.6% | Tragic 45.6% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.4% | Tragic 30.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.7% | Tragic 23.2% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.2% | Tragic 9.2% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.3% |
Bhutanese vs Pima Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 79.6%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 69.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 64.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 10.2%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 13.4%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 15.7%).
Disability Metric | Bhutanese | Pima |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.7% |
Males | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 14.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.5% | Tragic 38.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.1% | Tragic 55.8% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 18.8% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 8.2% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.8% |