Bhutanese vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Ecuadorian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Bhutanese
Ecuadorians
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ecuadorian Integration in Bhutanese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 291,697,837 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.498. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 6.5 Ecuadorians.
Bhutanese vs Ecuadorian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $54,958, a difference of 31.5%), median family income ($119,800 compared to $95,114, a difference of 26.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $93,739, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $53,911, a difference of 5.9%), median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $39,117, a difference of 11.6%), and median earnings ($52,297 compared to $45,214, a difference of 15.7%).
Income Metric | Bhutanese | Ecuadorian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $49,894 | Poor $41,958 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $119,800 | Tragic $95,114 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $100,151 | Poor $82,070 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $52,297 | Poor $45,214 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,759 | Tragic $51,596 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,648 | Fair $39,117 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,078 | Exceptional $53,911 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $109,520 | Poor $91,574 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $117,750 | Tragic $93,739 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $72,288 | Tragic $54,958 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.0% | Exceptional 22.9% |
Bhutanese vs Ecuadorian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 61.4%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 58.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (12.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.1%), single father poverty (15.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 10.2%), and single male poverty (11.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 12.9%).
Poverty Metric | Bhutanese | Ecuadorian |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Exceptional 7.0% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.2% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 14.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 19.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.6% | Tragic 19.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.1% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 17.7% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.0% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 25.6% | Tragic 30.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.3% | Tragic 14.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 15.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 14.9% |
Bhutanese vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 31.3%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Bhutanese | Ecuadorian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.4% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.0% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.7% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.5% |
Bhutanese vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 15.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.54%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.54%).
Labor Participation Metric | Bhutanese | Ecuadorian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.2% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Fair 36.3% | Tragic 31.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.4% | Tragic 72.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.7% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.5% | Tragic 82.3% |
Bhutanese vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 36.3%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 19.4%), and married-couple households (49.3% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Bhutanese | Ecuadorian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.3% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.3% | Tragic 43.5% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.6% | Tragic 43.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.9% | Poor 33.3% |
Bhutanese vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 161.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 74.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 58.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 17.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 40.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 58.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Bhutanese | Ecuadorian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 22.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Tragic 77.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.1% | Tragic 42.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 14.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 4.5% |
Bhutanese vs Ecuadorian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 64.1%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 59.1%), and professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.2%).
Education Level Metric | Bhutanese | Ecuadorian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 3.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Tragic 95.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 93.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Tragic 91.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Tragic 90.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Tragic 89.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.0% | Tragic 88.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.2% | Tragic 85.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.4% | Tragic 81.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.3% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.6% | Tragic 54.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.4% | Tragic 43.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.7% | Tragic 35.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.2% | Poor 14.0% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 3.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Bhutanese vs Ecuadorian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 27.8%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.33%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.62%), and female disability (11.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.4%).
Disability Metric | Bhutanese | Ecuadorian |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Excellent 11.0% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.5% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.1% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Average 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |