Belizean vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Belizean
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Belizeans
Chinese
1,156
SOCIAL INDEX
9.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
320th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Belizean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,502,165 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Belizean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.414. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Belizeans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.144% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Belizeans corresponds to an increase of 144.0 Chinese.
![Belizean Integration in Chinese Communities](/correlation-charts/comparison/belizeans-vs-chinese/belizeans-vs-chinese-community-integration.webp)
Belizean vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Belizean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,580 compared to $77,465, a difference of 41.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,684 compared to $116,156, a difference of 31.0%), and median household income ($77,028 compared to $98,496, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,429 compared to $41,461, a difference of 10.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,094 compared to $58,162, a difference of 13.8%), and median earnings ($42,702 compared to $48,836, a difference of 14.4%).
![Belizean vs Chinese Income](/correlation-charts/comparison/belizeans-vs-chinese/belizeans-vs-chinese-income.webp)
Income Metric | Belizean | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,097 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,880 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $77,028 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,702 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,358 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,429 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,094 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,534 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $88,684 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,580 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.2% | Average 25.9% |
Belizean vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Belizean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 79.6%), family poverty (11.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 73.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 67.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 5.3%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 22.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 24.3%).
![Belizean vs Chinese Poverty](/correlation-charts/comparison/belizeans-vs-chinese/belizeans-vs-chinese-poverty.webp)
Poverty Metric | Belizean | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Tragic 11.3% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.1% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 20.3% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.4% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Average 16.2% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.0% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Belizean vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Belizean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 41.5%), female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 41.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 23.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 26.0%).
![Belizean vs Chinese Unemployment](/correlation-charts/comparison/belizeans-vs-chinese/belizeans-vs-chinese-unemployment.webp)
Unemployment Metric | Belizean | Chinese |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 21.6% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.4% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.1% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Belizean vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Belizean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 17.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.4% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.8%).
![Belizean vs Chinese Labor Participation](/correlation-charts/comparison/belizeans-vs-chinese/belizeans-vs-chinese-labor-force.webp)
Labor Participation Metric | Belizean | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.8% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.2% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 32.8% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.4% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.1% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.5% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.1% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.8% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Belizean vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Belizean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 46.4%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 32.0%), and births to unmarried women (37.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.39 compared to 3.34, a difference of 1.4%), family households (64.8% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 6.8%).
![Belizean vs Chinese Family Structure](/correlation-charts/comparison/belizeans-vs-chinese/belizeans-vs-chinese-family-structure.webp)
Family Structure Metric | Belizean | Chinese |
Family Households | Excellent 64.8% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.8% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.2% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.39 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 42.2% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.0% | Excellent 30.2% |
Belizean vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Belizean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 74.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 40.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.7% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 7.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.0% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 17.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 28.6%).
![Belizean vs Chinese Vehicle Availability](/correlation-charts/comparison/belizeans-vs-chinese/belizeans-vs-chinese-vehicle-availability.webp)
Vehicle Availability Metric | Belizean | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 85.7% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.0% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Average 6.3% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Belizean vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Belizean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 103.9%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 26.7%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%).
![Belizean vs Chinese Education Level](/correlation-charts/comparison/belizeans-vs-chinese/belizeans-vs-chinese-education-level.webp)
Education Level Metric | Belizean | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 95.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 93.5% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.2% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.8% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 87.0% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 84.3% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.1% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.4% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.6% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 32.8% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.4% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.6% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Fair 1.8% |
Belizean vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Belizean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 33.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 19.0%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.59%), female disability (12.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.94%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
![Belizean vs Chinese Disability](/correlation-charts/comparison/belizeans-vs-chinese/belizeans-vs-chinese-disability.webp)
Disability Metric | Belizean | Chinese |
Disability | Poor 11.9% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Fair 11.4% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.5% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.0% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.8% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.4% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.6% |