Austrian vs Pima Community Comparison
COMPARE
Austrian
Pima
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Austrians
Pima
8,605
SOCIAL INDEX
83.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
60th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Pima Integration in Austrian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,376,620 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Austrian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.990. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Austrians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.088% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Austrians corresponds to an increase of 88.4 Pima.
Austrian vs Pima Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Austrian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,116 compared to $30,644, a difference of 57.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,692 compared to $73,365, a difference of 48.1%), and median household income ($91,339 compared to $63,262, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,898 compared to $51,503, a difference of 0.77%), median female earnings ($40,923 compared to $35,326, a difference of 15.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,842 compared to $82,821, a difference of 23.0%).
Income Metric | Austrian | Pima |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $48,116 | Tragic $30,644 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $111,306 | Tragic $77,431 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $91,339 | Tragic $63,262 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $49,501 | Tragic $38,285 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $59,359 | Tragic $42,357 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,923 | Tragic $35,326 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,898 | Poor $51,503 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $101,842 | Tragic $82,821 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $108,692 | Tragic $73,365 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,470 | Tragic $50,539 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.4% | Exceptional 21.1% |
Austrian vs Pima Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Austrian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 162.9%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 134.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 116.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 15.8%), single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 34.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 45.4%).
Poverty Metric | Austrian | Pima |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 21.9% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 18.4% |
Males | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 20.4% |
Females | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 23.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.5% | Tragic 28.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Excellent 13.1% | Tragic 25.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.1% | Tragic 27.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 29.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 29.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 28.2% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Tragic 20.2% |
Single Females | Excellent 20.4% | Tragic 30.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.1% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.7% | Tragic 38.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 11.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 19.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 23.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 19.0% |
Austrian vs Pima Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Austrian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 167.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 128.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 108.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Austrian | Pima |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 8.2% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 8.3% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 9.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 16.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 23.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.4% | Tragic 9.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.7% | Tragic 13.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.1% | Tragic 18.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 11.7% |
Austrian vs Pima Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Austrian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.5% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 10.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 12.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Austrian | Pima |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.6% | Tragic 57.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.5% | Tragic 34.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.5% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 74.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.7% | Tragic 74.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Excellent 83.0% | Tragic 72.8% |
Austrian vs Pima Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Austrian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 88.2%), births to unmarried women (31.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 65.8%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.050%), family households (64.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 7.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Austrian | Pima |
Family Households | Good 64.5% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.6% | Tragic 35.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.14 | Exceptional 3.75 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 4.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 8.3% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.7% | Tragic 35.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 31.0% | Tragic 51.5% |
Austrian vs Pima Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 60.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 16.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 5.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 12.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Austrian | Pima |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Tragic 14.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.3% | Tragic 86.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.4% | Tragic 52.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.9% | Exceptional 22.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Austrian vs Pima Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Austrian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 80.8%), bachelor's degree (40.6% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 75.1%), and associate's degree (49.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 62.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.19%).
Education Level Metric | Austrian | Pima |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Excellent 97.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Good 96.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.0% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.1% | Tragic 91.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Tragic 88.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Tragic 84.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.0% | Tragic 81.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.7% | Tragic 76.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.8% | Tragic 51.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.8% | Tragic 45.6% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.1% | Tragic 30.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.6% | Tragic 23.2% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 9.2% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 1.3% |
Austrian vs Pima Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 72.7%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 55.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.7%), male disability (11.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 8.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 9.1%).
Disability Metric | Austrian | Pima |
Disability | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 13.7% |
Males | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Tragic 14.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Poor 5.7% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Good 11.1% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.4% | Tragic 38.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.0% | Tragic 55.8% |
Vision | Good 2.1% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 18.8% |
Ambulatory | Average 6.1% | Tragic 8.2% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Tragic 2.8% |