Australian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Australian
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Australians
Chickasaw
9,058
SOCIAL INDEX
88.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
32nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Australian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,001,379 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.648. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.145% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 145.1 Chickasaw.
![Australian Integration in Chickasaw Communities](/correlation-charts/comparison/australians-vs-chickasaw/australians-vs-chickasaw-community-integration.webp)
Australian vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $36,475, a difference of 42.8%), median family income ($118,440 compared to $85,356, a difference of 38.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,912 compared to $77,929, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.7%), householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $44,763, a difference of 20.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $53,732, a difference of 24.5%).
![Australian vs Chickasaw Income](/correlation-charts/comparison/australians-vs-chickasaw/australians-vs-chickasaw-income.webp)
Income Metric | Australian | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,074 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $118,440 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $96,490 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $52,294 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $62,857 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,308 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,739 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $107,912 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $113,533 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,891 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.2% | Tragic 27.2% |
Australian vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 40.8%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 38.7%), and receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 17.8%).
![Australian vs Chickasaw Poverty](/correlation-charts/comparison/australians-vs-chickasaw/australians-vs-chickasaw-poverty.webp)
Poverty Metric | Australian | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.5% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Excellent 20.3% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.3% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 13.1% |
Australian vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 24.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 19.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.69%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.88%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.0%).
![Australian vs Chickasaw Unemployment](/correlation-charts/comparison/australians-vs-chickasaw/australians-vs-chickasaw-unemployment.webp)
Unemployment Metric | Australian | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Average 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.5% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Good 5.4% |
Australian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.7%).
![Australian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation](/correlation-charts/comparison/australians-vs-chickasaw/australians-vs-chickasaw-labor-force.webp)
Labor Participation Metric | Australian | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Good 65.3% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.5% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.8% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.5% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 84.9% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.3% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Fair 82.5% | Tragic 79.0% |
Australian vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 26.5%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 26.5%), and births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.8%), currently married (47.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (62.8% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.5%).
![Australian vs Chickasaw Family Structure](/correlation-charts/comparison/australians-vs-chickasaw/australians-vs-chickasaw-family-structure.webp)
Family Structure Metric | Australian | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 62.8% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.9% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.4% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.6% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.5% | Tragic 36.3% |
Australian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 28.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 10.4%).
![Australian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability](/correlation-charts/comparison/australians-vs-chickasaw/australians-vs-chickasaw-vehicle-availability.webp)
Vehicle Availability Metric | Australian | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.1% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.0% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.1% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.6% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Australian vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 75.1%), master's degree (18.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 61.0%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 58.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%).
![Australian vs Chickasaw Education Level](/correlation-charts/comparison/australians-vs-chickasaw/australians-vs-chickasaw-education-level.webp)
Education Level Metric | Australian | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.0% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.1% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.1% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.9% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.2% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.1% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.4% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.6% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.9% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.0% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.4% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 1.5% |
Australian vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 54.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 49.8%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 7.8%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 12.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 24.1%).
![Australian vs Chickasaw Disability](/correlation-charts/comparison/australians-vs-chickasaw/australians-vs-chickasaw-disability.webp)
Disability Metric | Australian | Chickasaw |
Disability | Excellent 11.5% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Average 11.3% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.0% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.7% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Good 17.2% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |