Argentinean vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Argentinean
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Argentineans
Chickasaw
8,055
SOCIAL INDEX
78.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
90th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Argentinean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,827,430 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.733. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.048% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to an increase of 48.0 Chickasaw.
![Argentinean Integration in Chickasaw Communities](/correlation-charts/comparison/argentineans-vs-chickasaw/argentineans-vs-chickasaw-community-integration.webp)
Argentinean vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,862 compared to $36,475, a difference of 36.7%), median household income ($93,960 compared to $70,005, a difference of 34.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,103 compared to $82,193, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.65%), householder income under 25 years ($54,154 compared to $44,763, a difference of 21.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,246 compared to $53,732, a difference of 21.4%).
![Argentinean vs Chickasaw Income](/correlation-charts/comparison/argentineans-vs-chickasaw/argentineans-vs-chickasaw-income.webp)
Income Metric | Argentinean | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $49,862 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $112,665 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,960 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,399 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $60,117 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,952 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,154 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $103,111 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $110,103 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,246 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.0% | Tragic 27.2% |
Argentinean vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 42.1%), single female poverty (19.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 37.5%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 15.3%).
![Argentinean vs Chickasaw Poverty](/correlation-charts/comparison/argentineans-vs-chickasaw/argentineans-vs-chickasaw-poverty.webp)
Poverty Metric | Argentinean | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Excellent 8.4% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Excellent 12.8% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.4% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.6% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.8% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.2% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Good 5.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.7% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 13.1% |
Argentinean vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 23.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.41%).
![Argentinean vs Chickasaw Unemployment](/correlation-charts/comparison/argentineans-vs-chickasaw/argentineans-vs-chickasaw-unemployment.webp)
Unemployment Metric | Argentinean | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Fair 5.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Good 5.4% |
Argentinean vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 15.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.9%).
![Argentinean vs Chickasaw Labor Participation](/correlation-charts/comparison/argentineans-vs-chickasaw/argentineans-vs-chickasaw-labor-force.webp)
Labor Participation Metric | Argentinean | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.7% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.0% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 33.3% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.1% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.6% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.3% | Tragic 79.0% |
Argentinean vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 28.3%), births to unmarried women (30.0% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 21.0%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.89%), currently married (47.1% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.2%).
![Argentinean vs Chickasaw Family Structure](/correlation-charts/comparison/argentineans-vs-chickasaw/argentineans-vs-chickasaw-family-structure.webp)
Family Structure Metric | Argentinean | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.5% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Good 47.1% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 30.0% | Tragic 36.3% |
Argentinean vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 42.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 17.2%).
![Argentinean vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability](/correlation-charts/comparison/argentineans-vs-chickasaw/argentineans-vs-chickasaw-vehicle-availability.webp)
Vehicle Availability Metric | Argentinean | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.9% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.5% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.9% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Argentinean vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 76.3%), master's degree (18.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 59.2%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 51.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.7% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.35%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.44%).
![Argentinean vs Chickasaw Education Level](/correlation-charts/comparison/argentineans-vs-chickasaw/argentineans-vs-chickasaw-education-level.webp)
Education Level Metric | Argentinean | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Fair 97.5% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Fair 97.0% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.9% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.5% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.8% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Average 93.7% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Good 92.7% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.6% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.5% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.7% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.4% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 63.2% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.2% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.3% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.2% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Argentinean vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 71.7%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 63.6%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 58.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 10.8%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 11.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 24.1%).
![Argentinean vs Chickasaw Disability](/correlation-charts/comparison/argentineans-vs-chickasaw/argentineans-vs-chickasaw-disability.webp)
Disability Metric | Argentinean | Chickasaw |
Disability | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |