American vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
American
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Americans
Chinese
3,435
SOCIAL INDEX
31.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
220th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in American Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,705,365 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.074. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Americans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Americans corresponds to a decrease of 2.2 Chinese.
American vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($55,527 compared to $77,465, a difference of 39.5%), median household income ($75,932 compared to $98,496, a difference of 29.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,536 compared to $116,156, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 7.5%), median male earnings ($50,761 compared to $56,872, a difference of 12.0%), and median earnings ($42,742 compared to $48,836, a difference of 14.3%).
Income Metric | American | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,039 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $92,096 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,932 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,742 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,761 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,777 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $48,860 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,791 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $90,536 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $55,527 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.8% | Average 25.9% |
American vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (20.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 56.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (18.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 56.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 53.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 24.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 27.5%), and single father poverty (20.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 30.2%).
Poverty Metric | American | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.6% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 20.5% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.3% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 15.8% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 20.1% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.5% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.6% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Fair 12.2% | Exceptional 9.8% |
American vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 75.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 36.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.1%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 8.8%).
Unemployment Metric | American | Chinese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Fair 11.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Fair 5.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.4% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.4% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
American vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (40.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | American | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.1% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.0% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.3% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.1% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.7% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.4% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.4% | Exceptional 84.1% |
American vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 27.1%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 23.5%), and births to unmarried women (36.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.0% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 3.2%), family households (65.5% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and family households with children (27.3% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 4.8%).
Family Structure Metric | American | Chinese |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.5% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.3% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.9% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Poor 6.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.0% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.4% | Excellent 30.2% |
American vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 17.6%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (60.0% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 0.10%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.68%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 5.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | American | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.5% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.0% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.6% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.5% | Exceptional 8.8% |
American vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 25.2%), bachelor's degree (31.9% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 20.7%), and associate's degree (40.8% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.14%).
Education Level Metric | American | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Good 92.7% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 91.0% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.1% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.7% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.0% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.4% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.8% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.9% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.3% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.6% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Fair 1.8% |
American vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 62.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 39.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.64%), hearing disability (3.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.5%).
Disability Metric | American | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 13.9% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 14.1% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.9% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.8% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.9% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Good 17.2% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.6% |