Alaska Native vs Immigrants from Eastern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,752,077 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Europe within Alaska Native communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.328. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaska Natives within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.033% in Immigrants from Eastern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaska Natives corresponds to a decrease of 33.1 Immigrants from Eastern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,558 compared to $49,316, a difference of 24.7%), median male earnings ($49,711 compared to $60,958, a difference of 22.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,018 compared to $104,662, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,000 compared to $55,572, a difference of 2.9%), householder income over 65 years ($60,748 compared to $62,693, a difference of 3.2%), and wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 44.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 39.9%), and single male poverty (15.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.42%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 10.1%), and single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (14.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 66.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (10.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 59.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 58.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 21.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 22.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.98%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 75.9%), births to unmarried women (38.3% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 38.9%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.7%), married-couple households (45.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and currently married (45.5% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 35.1%), no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 28.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 51.5%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 51.4%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.9% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.23%), 11th grade (93.5% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and 12th grade, no diploma (91.6% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 148.0%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 50.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.2%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 6.6%).