Alaska Native vs Crow Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,464,517 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Crow within Alaska Native communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.368. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaska Natives within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.037% in Crow. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaska Natives corresponds to an increase of 37.1 Crow.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Crow communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 28.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,991 compared to $74,257, a difference of 26.6%), and median household income ($79,509 compared to $63,681, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,202 compared to $35,266, a difference of 8.3%), median earnings ($43,750 compared to $38,707, a difference of 13.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,000 compared to $47,012, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (18.1% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 67.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 58.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 56.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (15.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 16.3%), single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 24.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 35.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Crow communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 167.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 155.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (14.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 148.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.8% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Crow communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (81.3% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.6% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Crow communities in the United States are seen in average family size (3.37 compared to 3.82, a difference of 13.3%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 13.2%), and currently married (45.5% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.31%), single father households (3.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Crow communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 57.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 4.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Crow communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 11.2%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 9.6%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.010%), 10th grade (94.9% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.20%), and associate's degree (37.5% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Crow communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 137.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.86%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.2%).