Alaska Native vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,856,349 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Alaska Native communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.525. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaska Natives within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.108% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaska Natives corresponds to an increase of 108.2 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,991 compared to $78,960, a difference of 19.0%), householder income under 25 years ($54,000 compared to $45,371, a difference of 19.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,018 compared to $74,847, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($49,711 compared to $46,594, a difference of 6.7%), median earnings ($43,750 compared to $39,648, a difference of 10.3%), and wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Creek communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (16.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 28.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 25.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.53%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.97%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (14.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 87.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (7.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 64.9%), and male unemployment (8.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 45.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 7.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.3% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 34.6%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 15.8%), and family households with children (29.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.6% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 0.75%), currently married (45.5% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.96%), and family households (65.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 123.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 10.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Creek communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 11.8%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 11.2%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.24%), 5th grade (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.25%), and associate's degree (37.5% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 78.8%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 36.6%), and female disability (12.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (30.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age over 75 (52.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.7%).