Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Fort Worth, TX

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Renter-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Fort Worth
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Fort Worth

0.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Fort Worth Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Fort Worth, TX

Zip Code % Renter-Occupied vs State vs National
1.7615599.4%37.6%(+61.8)#2435.2%(+64.2)#311
2.7610276.2%37.6%(+38.6)#7135.2%(+41.0)#794
3.7613268.0%37.6%(+30.4)#10235.2%(+32.8)#1,184
4.7611666.8%37.6%(+29.2)#10835.2%(+31.7)#1,243
5.7610460.7%37.6%(+23.1)#15035.2%(+25.5)#1,741
6.7610754.0%37.6%(+16.4)#19735.2%(+18.9)#2,463
7.7611553.8%37.6%(+16.2)#20035.2%(+18.6)#2,500
8.7612052.1%37.6%(+14.5)#22235.2%(+16.9)#2,749
9.7610651.3%37.6%(+13.7)#23035.2%(+16.1)#2,872
10.7611250.7%37.6%(+13.1)#24135.2%(+15.5)#2,986
11.7617748.8%37.6%(+11.2)#27135.2%(+13.6)#3,316
12.7610548.0%37.6%(+10.4)#28735.2%(+12.9)#3,433
13.7610948.0%37.6%(+10.4)#28835.2%(+12.9)#3,434
14.7611946.1%37.6%(+8.52)#32135.2%(+10.9)#3,808
15.7611445.1%37.6%(+7.52)#33935.2%(+9.94)#4,027
16.7611144.4%37.6%(+6.75)#35435.2%(+9.17)#4,236
17.7616441.5%37.6%(+3.92)#41435.2%(+6.34)#4,954
18.7613740.7%37.6%(+3.12)#43635.2%(+5.54)#5,191
19.7613339.5%37.6%(+1.93)#46435.2%(+4.35)#5,547
20.7613438.0%37.6%(+0.441)#50435.2%(+2.86)#6,071
21.7611037.9%37.6%(+0.273)#50835.2%(+2.69)#6,140
22.7610337.1%37.6%(-0.549)#52435.2%(+1.87)#6,458
23.7613535.1%37.6%(-2.47)#57435.2%(-0.046)#7,281
24.7614033.4%37.6%(-4.22)#63735.2%(-1.80)#8,109
25.7611830.0%37.6%(-7.65)#76935.2%(-5.23)#10,101
26.7610829.7%37.6%(-7.95)#78135.2%(-5.53)#10,296
27.7613124.3%37.6%(-13.3)#1,01835.2%(-10.9)#14,265
28.7612322.1%37.6%(-15.5)#1,13635.2%(-13.1)#16,233
29.7617921.7%37.6%(-15.9)#1,16035.2%(-13.5)#16,641
30.7614820.4%37.6%(-17.2)#1,21435.2%(-14.8)#17,802
31.7612617.3%37.6%(-20.3)#1,36635.2%(-17.8)#20,800

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Fort Worth, TX?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Fort Worth, TX are:
#1
99.4%
#2
76.2%
#3
68.0%
#4
66.8%
#5
60.7%
#6
54.0%
#7
53.8%
#8
52.1%
#9
51.3%
#10
50.7%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Fort Worth, TX?
76155 has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Fort Worth, TX with 99.4%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Fort Worth, TX?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Fort Worth is 43.3%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Texas?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Texas is 37.6%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States is 35.2%.